Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing to install Python 3.7 on macOS arm64 #13

Closed
krlmlr opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Failing to install Python 3.7 on macOS arm64 #13

krlmlr opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@krlmlr
Copy link

krlmlr commented Apr 24, 2024

https://github.com/hannes/duckdb-rfuns/actions/runs/8816067894/job/24199401883#step:5:17

  Version 3.7 was not found in the local cache
  Error: The version '3.7' with architecture 'arm64' was not found for macOS 14.4.1.
  The list of all available versions can be found here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/actions/python-versions/main/versions-manifest.json

Interestingly, the same error appears on macOS amd64, even if Python 3.7 seems to be supported there: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/actions/python-versions/main/versions-manifest.json

https://github.com/hannes/duckdb-rfuns/actions/runs/8816067894/job/24199401199#step:5:17

Is there any downside to bumping to the most recent version?

@krlmlr
Copy link
Author

krlmlr commented Apr 24, 2024

Why do we even need to install Python? Is the regular python3 available on the workers not sufficient here? Seems to be sufficient for the "deploy" workflows.

krlmlr added a commit to hannes/duckdb-rfuns that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
@krlmlr
Copy link
Author

krlmlr commented Apr 24, 2024

I have no idea why duckdb_spatial seems to work. Caching?

https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb_spatial/actions/runs/8680419083/job/23800921790

krlmlr added a commit to hannes/duckdb-rfuns that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
@carlopi
Copy link
Collaborator

carlopi commented Sep 10, 2024

I think this can be closed, there are still some variance in Python version used but it should be OK for now since the lowest is 3.9.

@carlopi carlopi closed this as completed Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants