Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint to version 3.2.0 🚀 #16

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint just published its new version 3.2.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint
New version 3.2.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 29, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3aa4930 on greenkeeper-eslint-3.2.0 into d5a61a8 on master.

@dustinspecker dustinspecker deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-3.2.0 branch November 12, 2016 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants