-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
plans to integrate with internlm2 #1
Comments
DietDietDiet
changed the title
plans to integtate with internlm2
plans to integrate with internlm2
Jan 30, 2024
Sorry for the late reply. |
cool. looking forward to it :) . Would internlm's benchmark fit for
internlm2?
…On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 12:49 AM Yuechen ***@***.***> wrote:
Sorry for the late reply.
Currently, we are working on the LLaVA-v1.6's adaptation.
We are planning to release our v2 version in late Feb, which may include
internlm's benchmark eval code.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMDRFRHR6WFXJDLPNAIPSFTYR632LAVCNFSM6AAAAABCQPD7LKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMRVHAZDOMZTGY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@DietDietDiet I will try to fit it if possible. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, thanks for your great work!
I 'm planning to verify the performance on internlm2 based mllms, I noticed that the integration of internlm is TBD, just wondering any plans to support internlm2, and the estimated time?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: