-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make load balancing configurable #1573
Make load balancing configurable #1573
Conversation
Victor-M-Giraldo
commented
Mar 27, 2024
- Closes make the load balancing algorithm configurable #1294
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the To trigger a single review, invoke the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1573 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 61.3468% 61.3344% -0.0124%
================================================
Files 170 170
Lines 24844 24849 +5
Branches 1461 1462 +1
================================================
Hits 15241 15241
- Misses 9547 9552 +5
Partials 56 56 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good so far.
Shouldn't something like this work? It's asking me to implement the trait for the enum though I think which makes no sense to me. Am I going in the wrong direction here though? |
It only works if you implement the trait for the enum. The enum does not automatically implement traits that the variants implement. The enum is a completely new type. |
I'm trying to figure out why these tests are failing. I'm running |
/rerun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good
Why is the config failing to be initialized. I thought this logic is okay. If Nevermind, saw the above review. |
Passing run #1589 ↗︎
Details:
Review all test suite changes for PR #1573 ↗︎ |