You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2026. It is now read-only.
SchwartzTP edited this page Sep 3, 2013
·
1 revision
This page tracks the feedback that doesn't really fit into an issue. Commentary like "I think Commerce has a better interface at http://my_fav_commerce_site.gov because I've been using it for years and it makes sense" is useful, although it can't really be classified as an issue as it's not something that can be fixed.
Also, while some feedback could certainly be classified as an issue that might (will) get closed by a "wont' fix", this location is a decent place to document this feedback so that it can be discussed and distilled into specific issue tickets as appropriate.
* There also seems to be no place to add product specifications or attachments such as drawings. In the case above, I have very specific specifications on capacities, loads, temperature ratings, materials, etc. Also drawings. I think it would be helpful for the reader of BIDS to have this information easily accessible.
* : General consensus seems to indicate that this could be a useful feature of a future version of the site, and that [#16](https://github.com/eDiper/bids/issues/16) would address this.
Useful Feedback
The Field Project Description and Bidding Requirements is presented in one line. As we entered our description of the project, we could only see one line and not what we already wrote. We would prefer to see all the text that we have written into that box—it makes it easier to write something when you see what you have already written so far
It is always good to have an example of a filled-in form. For example, instead of Title, we would prefer Title (for example Waste Water Projects in Croatia) to ensure consistency