Separate sex and gender; report percentages for 3 categories each

[drfeinberg]

Description

This PR aims at updating the Sex category that previously reported only the number of female participants to deal with both Sex and Gender separately, and provide 3 options each:
Sex: Female/Male/Other;
Gender: Woman/Man/Non-Binary

Proposed Changes

I added new functions for gender, changed the examples to have a gender category, and a 3rd option in each example.

[IndrajeetPatil]

Thanks a lot!

Can you please also adjust and update the tests here accordingly?
https://github.com/easystats/report/blob/master/tests/testthat/test-report_participants.R

And please also create an entry in NEWS.md to log this change.

[drfeinberg]

Hi Indrajeet,
I have made those changes.
Here is what I put in the NEWS...

• Separated sex and gender into different searches/columns
• Sex is reported % female, % male, % other, % missing if any cases are missing
• Gender is reported % Women, % Men, % Non-Binary, % missing if any cases are missing
• Age reports % missing if any cases are missing
• Tests have been updated to reflect these changes
• Tests for missing cases have also been updated to test numbers for NA, and strings for "" as "" is not NA.

It looks like there was to be a discussion about how to approach missing values in the test file. I hope I didn't step on any toes by making some changes. They are well commented so you can see what I did and why.
Best,
David

[IndrajeetPatil]

Thanks for the thorough treatment.
Expect tests to fail because we still need to make some changes in master branch.

Once @bwiernik also approves, this can be merged.

[DominiqueMakowski]

Thanks a lot @drfeinberg !

[IndrajeetPatil]

@bwiernik Can you please have a look at this soon? Thanks.

[drfeinberg]

Hey. If it turns out my code is useful and there are other small tasks like this that need getting done, let me know, I'm happy to help out.

[bwiernik]

@IndrajeetPatil these changes look good to me. Could you update the tests?

At some point, we should generalize this by taking a named list of matching values. That would let people do their own systems and also, eg, use terms from other languages. Would also work for race/ethnicity, occupation, major, etc.

[IndrajeetPatil]

The tests to be updated are not relevant for this feature (those have already been updated in the PR itself), so I am merging this.