Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delay lock-related operations in single thread mode #14583
Delay lock-related operations in single thread mode #14583
Changes from all commits
4fd47d9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does pool iteration guarantee the same order FIFO iteration order? i.e. the first notify we delay should be the first we do after exiting single threaded mode. Similarly the 2nd should be the 2nd, etc.
If the pool iteration order isn't guaranteed (and documented!) I think these should have a
J9DelayedSingleThreadModeOpRecord *next
field as well and they should be stored in a linked list. The pool is fine for backing the allocation but we should iterate through the list to do the notifies.And likely need two pointers - one for the head of the list and one for the tail so we can insert quickly at the tail and iterate from the head
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tracepoint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a use after free issue as you've removed the element from the pool (free) and then dereferenced it.