Check that the 34 test is seeing an older version #3979
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Exact version check complicates things as it has to be updated for every minor bump of equinox. Co-authored-by: Christoph Läubrich <laeubi@laeubi-soft.de>
|
/request-license-review |
License review requests: After all reviews have concluded, re-run the license-vetting check from the Github Actions web-interface to update its status. Workflow run (with attached summary files): |
|
Don’t let the license thing hold you up. It’s a glitch of some sort. |
|
It currently breaks the auto-merge feature 😢 |
Test Results 597 files ±0 597 suites ±0 4h 21m 13s ⏱️ + 1m 30s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit ec61a57. ± Comparison against base commit bfcb630. |
|
Thanks, makes sense. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Exact version check complicates things as it has to be updated for every minor bump of equinox.
FYI @akurtakov so we do not need to increment this on every equinox change!