Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Obsolete restriction on mvf:VocabularyEntry #599

Open
mereolog opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Obsolete restriction on mvf:VocabularyEntry #599

mereolog opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mereolog
Copy link
Contributor

https://www.omg.org/spec/MVF/MultipleVocabularyFacility/VocabularyEntry has an obsolete restriction:

<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&cmns-dsg;denotes"/>
<owl:onClass rdf:resource="&mvf;MVFEntry"/>
<owl:minQualifiedCardinality rdf:datatype="&xsd;nonNegativeInteger">0</owl:minQualifiedCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>

which can be inferred from:

<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="&cmns-dsg;denotes"/>
<owl:onClass rdf:resource="&mvf;MVFEntry"/>
<owl:qualifiedCardinality rdf:datatype="&xsd;nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:qualifiedCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>

@tw-osthus
Copy link
Contributor

The first restriction is a min 0 tautology. It can never be inferred.

@ElisaKendall
Copy link
Contributor

@merelog @tw-osthus This issue will be resolved in the OMG MVF revision task force and the resulting solution will be brought back over to IDMP. See https://issues.omg.org/browse/MVF11-15 for additional detail.

@mereolog
Copy link
Contributor Author

The first restriction is a min 0 tautology. It can never be inferred.

This is just a technicality, but all tautologies can be inferred from any ontology.

@mereolog mereolog modified the milestones: Release 1.2.0, Release 1.3.0 Aug 9, 2024
@mereolog mereolog removed this from the Release 1.3.0 milestone Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants