Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify Syntax #177

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 7, 2022
Merged

Simplify Syntax #177

merged 16 commits into from
Nov 7, 2022

Conversation

b-studios
Copy link
Collaborator

@b-studios b-studios commented Nov 5, 2022

Over the weekend, I took the time to cleanup the code base a bit. Quite a few changes accumulated:

  • dropped extern effect since we have capabilities to take over this job (will be reintroduced later as extern interface, though).
  • started to separate symbols from types. Previously, symbols like TypeVar have been a symbol and a type at the same time. By separating the two, it was possible to split symbols.scala into symbols.scala and types.scala making the distinction a bit more clear: (there is work left to do: CaptureUnificationVars are still symbols AND captures -- that's for another weekend).
  • split record into Record + Construtor. This way data types do not give rise to record definitions for their variants, again making things a bit clearer (@phischu this should also help the LLVM backend).

@b-studios b-studios changed the title Drop syntax for multiple value argument sections Simplify Syntax Nov 5, 2022
@b-studios b-studios merged commit 6d47a50 into master Nov 7, 2022
@b-studios b-studios deleted the feature/simplify-syntax branch November 7, 2022 09:13
@marzipankaiser marzipankaiser restored the feature/simplify-syntax branch November 7, 2022 16:00
@marzipankaiser marzipankaiser deleted the feature/simplify-syntax branch November 7, 2022 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant