Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 27, 2024. It is now read-only.

[WIP] Initial start to the remove port definition work #444

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

robtec
Copy link
Contributor

@robtec robtec commented Mar 27, 2015

Started looking at https://github.com/shipyard/shipyard/issues/373

Will keep the PR up to date with changes :)

@ehazlett
Copy link
Owner

Awesome thanks!

ehazlett and others added 4 commits March 29, 2015 10:47
Introduced route resolve of the promise returned by ngResource for the containers view
…rt-removal-fix

Conflicts:
	controller/static/app/containers/deploy.controller.js
	controller/static/app/containers/deploy.html
	controller/static/app/utils.js
@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented Mar 29, 2015

@ehazlett @tombee Just some changes to the addition of a port definition and how its displayed, its still a WIP as the UI stuff doesn't work with the backend yet. Just looking for feedback on the overall look 😄

@ehazlett
Copy link
Owner

@robtec do you have screenshots or anything for a quick view?

@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented Mar 30, 2015

@ehazlett First image is defining a port definition

ports1

The second one is a look at how the definitions could be added to a table, easily deleted too

ports2

What's your thoughts?

@tombee
Copy link
Contributor

tombee commented Mar 30, 2015

I think it'd be cool to just add another row of <input>s each time the 'add' button is pressed.. rather than adding a table below, what do you think? It might be more compact that way too.

Also, could the 'Add' button be inline with the row of <input>s? Could perhaps swap it out for an ui button icon that has a + icon?

The 'added' rows would then have an x icon in-line, instead of the + on the add row at the top.

Binding inputs would also allow for the user to modify the port definitions after they have been added, in the case that they make a mistake or something.

@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented Mar 30, 2015

Yeah sounds good, I was wondering about editing the table but yeah adding input rows sounds better :)

@ehazlett
Copy link
Owner

Yeah I think having the inline inputs with just the ability to remove would be nice. I'm not a fan of the table. :) Thanks!

@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented Mar 30, 2015

Cool, I'll scrap the table, cheers for the feedback :)

@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented May 3, 2015

@ehazlett should we write this off as its addressed in V3?

@ehazlett
Copy link
Owner

ehazlett commented May 4, 2015

Yes thanks!

@ehazlett ehazlett closed this May 4, 2015
@ehazlett
Copy link
Owner

ehazlett commented May 4, 2015

Thanks for the contribution. This is now part of the new v3 ui. Thanks!

@robtec robtec deleted the port-removal-fix branch May 4, 2015 18:16
@robtec
Copy link
Contributor Author

robtec commented May 4, 2015

👍 cheers @ehazlett

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants