Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dante Virtual Soundcard #8

Closed
swalcott1 opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Dante Virtual Soundcard #8

swalcott1 opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@swalcott1
Copy link

Hi:

i'm not a programmer, i'm a semi-ignorant recording engineer. i'm bringing multi-channel audio from a macbook to a windows 7 pc using dante virtual sound card.

i can bring the audio into my daw but i can't monitor it/route it to my windows 7 sound card and i'm trying to using synchronous audio router to do that. i'm trying to bring anywhere from 8-12 tracks of audio from the macbook into the pc and monitor each track in my daw software. is this a bad idea? right now i can't see how to do this.

you've clearly explained that a playback channel goes into an asio input channel but i'm having trouble envisioning how to get the virtual sound card connected to the sound card outputs

it's a really cool app and i promise not get you bogged down in a million questions.

thanks,

steven walcott

@eiz
Copy link
Owner

eiz commented May 11, 2016

I'm not really familiar with Dante at all, but the core design choice in SAR that allows it to be efficient and avoid clock drift is that it is linked to a single ASIO device. That means if you want to use SAR with Dante's ASIO driver, you can't also use it with some local sound card on your machine at the same time, because the two are not clock-synchronized with one another. You would instead need to monitor through a Dante-enabled audio device, I think.

I've got some long term plans to integrate native networking support into SAR for multi-machine setups, but don't currently have time to work on it. You could try creating an aggregate interface using ASIO4ALL but my general feeling is that it will cause you nothing but pain and suffering due to the clock issues.

@swalcott1
Copy link
Author

hey mackenzie:

thanks a whole bunch for getting back to me.
i somewhat concluded the same in a much lower iq fashion but it's good to
get confirmation from the software creator.

i tried to make an aggregate device, but for some reason dante soundcard
won't aggregate.

anyway, that's my problem and thanks again for writing the code and getting
back to me.

steven

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Mackenzie Straight <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

I'm not really familiar with Dante at all, but the core design choice in
SAR that allows it to be efficient and avoid clock drift is that it is
linked to a single ASIO device. That means if you want to use SAR with
Dante's ASIO driver, you can't also use it with some local sound card on
your machine at the same time, because the two are not clock-synchronized
with one another. You would instead need to monitor through a Dante-enabled
audio device, I think.

I've got some long term plans to integrate native networking support into
SAR for multi-machine setups, but don't currently have time to work on it.
You could try creating an aggregate interface using ASIO4ALL but my general
feeling is that it will cause you nothing but pain and suffering due to the
clock issues.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment)

@eiz eiz closed this as completed May 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants