Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

listing place references and the histogram (priority: gap desired) #17

Closed
atomrab opened this issue Dec 2, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@atomrab
Copy link

atomrab commented Dec 2, 2013

It occurs to me that there is a workaround for the conflict between the UI constraints of the histogram and the user's desire to find all the references to a particular place (that is, through the interface, rather than in ARK).

Keeping the histogram with 50 bars and clusters of pages with references, could we also provide a list of links to individual references on the place page? That way, you could click to an area of a book where that place appears using the histogram, but if you want greater resolution, you could go to the place page and see all of the book/chapters where that place appears -- and then you could jump to particular references from there. Would this work? It would be relevant to Gap in general, I think.

@enridaga
Copy link
Collaborator

enridaga commented Dec 6, 2013

This may surely work. Will first work on sections, we can then show the
list of references grouped by section.
Once we have sections we may also rethink the histogram, we may try to
group pages consistently to sections.

On 2 December 2013 18:42, atomrab notifications@github.com wrote:

It occurs to me that there is a workaround for the conflict between the UI
constraints of the histogram and the user's desire to find all the
references to a particular place (that is, through the interface, rather
than in ARK).

Keeping the histogram with 50 bars and clusters of pages with references,
could we also provide a list of links to individual references on the place
page? That way, you could click to an area of a book where that place
appears using the histogram, but if you want greater resolution, you could
go to the place page and see all of the book/chapters where that place
appears -- and then you could jump to particular references from there.
Would this work? It would be relevant to Gap in general, I think.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/17
.

Enrico Daga

http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan

@ekansa
Copy link
Owner

ekansa commented Mar 11, 2014

OK. I'll make a JSON service to return a list to individual page references to a place, by ID and by place URI. Something like (warning hand coded JSON)?

{"label": "Place label",
"uri": "Place URI",
"lat": lat,
"lon" lon,
"references": [
["bookID": 1, "pageID",232],
["bookID": 1, "pageID",234],
["bookID": 2, "pageID",444]
]
}

@enridaga
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Eric,
this is not needed, since we already have all the data about links to
places in the current book. If I am not wrong the request is to show all
links to place references, organized by chapter but listed explicitly
instead of grouped like in the frequency diagram.
BTW I already implemented this and I will push it on the web as soon as
other things are ready too. So I don't need you to do anything.
Thank you for caring, btw :)

On 11 March 2014 13:45, Eric Kansa notifications@github.com wrote:

OK. I'll make a JSON service to return a list to individual page
references to a place, by ID and by place URI. Something like (warning hand
coded JSON)?

{"label": "Place label",
"uri": "Place URI",
"lat": lat,
"lon" lon,
"references": [
["bookID": 1, "pageID",232],
["bookID": 1, "pageID",234],
["bookID": 2, "pageID",444]
]
}


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/17#issuecomment-37296361
.


enridaga

@enridaga
Copy link
Collaborator

enridaga commented Apr 7, 2014

This has been implemented. See enridaga/gapvis#21

@enridaga enridaga closed this as completed Apr 7, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants