Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

topbeat - exclude filesystems #915

Closed
RuBiCK opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

topbeat - exclude filesystems #915

RuBiCK opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@RuBiCK
Copy link

RuBiCK commented Feb 3, 2016

It would be great if topbeat could do something like exclude_filesystems with regex, like filebeat does with exclude_files

It will be useful for filesystems like "tmpfs", "proc", "sys", "dev", etc...

I have about seven in memory filesystems per server like mentioned above, for about 200 servers sending this data each minute, that is a lot of useless information that I would like to filter and do not send to ES

@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

The issue duplicates #914.

@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

There are two options here: one would be to add a configuration option in topbeat as you suggested (exclude_filesystems) and the other would be to use generic filtering to drop the events that contain information about the undesired filesystems.

@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

Closing the issue as it duplicates #914.

@RuBiCK
Copy link
Author

RuBiCK commented Feb 3, 2016

Thanks for the information @monicasarbu,

I have read #914 and #451 and It's difficult find documentation about how use it. It says:

define a generic filtering that is implemented in libbeat and used by all the Beats, instead of having a specific filtering implementation for each Beat.

But inside topbeat.yml there is libbeat config section but it only has: output, shipper and logging sections. Where should I put the filter conditions? as top level section?

@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

Actually none of the options that I presented is not yet implemented. Sorry for the confusion. We are working at the moment on the generic filtering feature and it will be available in one of the next major releases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants