-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 444
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing labels.* and annotations.* fields to kubernetes package #2361
Add missing labels.* and annotations.* fields to kubernetes package #2361
Conversation
…rvice resources; update sample_events Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co>
💚 Build Succeeded
Expand to view the summary
Build stats
Test stats 🧪
🤖 GitHub commentsTo re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:
|
packages/kubernetes/manifest.yml
Outdated
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
format_version: 1.0.0 | |||
name: kubernetes | |||
title: Kubernetes | |||
version: 1.8.0 | |||
version: 1.8.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say 1.9.0
and upgrade the stack version of the package to 8.1.0
. We need to confirm though with ecosystem team that it's fine to remove the 7.16.0 constraint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update on this. We can leave the constraint as is for now, 7.16.0 + 8.0.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 for the 1.9.0 but I don't think we should change the Kibana constraints. The older versions won't report those fields. This won't create any issue.If we remove the 7.16.0 then we won't be able to deliver bugfixes like #2288
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've changed version to 1.9.0
5ec5290
Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, let's wait for CI
I merged #2288 so you will have to resolve the version conflicts first |
…lastic#2361) * add missing labels.* and annotations.* fields to pod,container and service resources; update sample_events Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co> * add pr link; remove redundant node fields for service Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co> * run format and check Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co> * bump version of the package to 1.9.0 Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko <tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Tetiana Kravchenko tetiana.kravchenko@elastic.co
What does this PR do?
labels.*
andannotations.
* fields to kubernetes package resources: pod, container and serviceChecklist
changelog.yml
file.How to test this PR locally
Related issues
Screenshots