Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue when using _time_utc as df index in parallel runs #5

Closed
elcorto opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Issue when using _time_utc as df index in parallel runs #5

elcorto opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@elcorto
Copy link
Owner

elcorto commented May 19, 2022

Multiuple _pset_ids can end up having the same index if runs start at the same time.

@elcorto elcorto self-assigned this May 19, 2022
elcorto added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2022
See #4 and #5

Multiuple _pset_ids can end up having the same index if parallel runs
start at the same time and index == _time_utc which is the start time
before func() is called. Use integer index now. Use time for verbose
printing though.

Also replace deprecated df.append() by pd.concat().

Add new _pset_runtime field where we record the run time of calling
func().
elcorto added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2022
Multiuple _pset_ids can end up having the same index if parallel runs
start at the same time and index == _time_utc which is the start time
before func() is called. Use integer index now. Use time for verbose
printing though.

Also replace deprecated df.append() by pd.concat().

Add new _pset_runtime field where we record the run time of calling
func().

Closes #4 and #5
@elcorto
Copy link
Owner Author

elcorto commented May 25, 2022

Fixed by 4888703

@elcorto elcorto closed this as completed May 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant