Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added "catch" to knob behavior #210

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 21, 2021

Conversation

gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor

I added a "catch" behavior to the knobs. Suppressed automatic page changing for some buttons. Fixed a couple of minor bugs.

@beserge
Copy link
Contributor

beserge commented Jul 26, 2021

I dig the catch behavior. It can be slightly confusing though when you turn a knob and the page doesn't change.
Maybe the page should change when the knob moves, but the controls should still use the catch behavior.
Just personal preference.

I noticed none of the controls other than reverb work when you have shift enabled. I don't really like that behavior.
IMO all that should change is whether control 8 maps to Reverb or Feedback.

@stephenhensley any thoughts?

@gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregornoriskin commented Jul 27, 2021 via email

@stephenhensley
Copy link
Collaborator

stephenhensley commented Jul 27, 2021

I haven't had a chance to try it out quite yet, but it changing to the correct page with the knob turn seems like a good UI decision.

I could go either way on the shift behavior, but if it's the only thing the shift button does right now then having it toggle only the reverb/feedback control makes sense as well.

@stephenhensley
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @gregornoriskin. Hope you're well. Looks like it was just a small change request remaining on this.

Just wanted to see if you were interested in wrapping that up since this has been sitting for a bit.

@gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregornoriskin commented Dec 1, 2021 via email

@stephenhensley
Copy link
Collaborator

@gregornoriskin thanks for the hasty response.

No need to apologize, just wanted to check in.

Thanks! Looking forward to merging this :)

@gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregornoriskin commented Dec 7, 2021 via email

@stephenhensley
Copy link
Collaborator

@gregornoriskin we don't have a specific policy in place yet.

If there were significant changes to the relevant files, I'd say resubmitting would be the best path forward, but the PR is still looking fairly clean (only 2 files changed), and I typically squash and merge on this repo so the commits will get grouped down to one.

So I think it's fine to leave to continue with this PR.

Let me know if you have any issues or questions.

@gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregornoriskin commented Dec 7, 2021 via email

@gregornoriskin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gregornoriskin commented Dec 20, 2021 via email

@beserge
Copy link
Contributor

beserge commented Dec 21, 2021

Works well, and the changes look good! I'd say it's ready to merge. 💯

@stephenhensley
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks again for the contribution @gregornoriskin !!

@stephenhensley stephenhensley merged commit 1284880 into electro-smith:master Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants