-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 652
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing of the model #41
Comments
Did you train your model to predict multiple classes? |
Yes we did the training with the exact same code you last committed. Also changed config file n_labels=4 |
ellisdg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2017
1) Uses SimpleITK if N4BiasFieldCorrection cannot be found by nipype (closes #52 & closes #32). 2) Adds predict.py file that uses the trained model and writes the predicted labels to file (closes #51). The predictions are now multi-label (closes #41 & closes #36). 3) Fixes relative import (closes #49). 4) Removes "pickable" flag from training which fixes and closes #47. 5) Adds batch normalization option (closes #39). 6) Adds option to use patch training. This is will substantially reduce the memory requirement for training. 7) Updates README. Links to data that do not require registration (closes #37).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello @ellisdg Can you provide some inputs on how to view prediction.nii.gz that is generated after testing. Also please explain what is multi-class classification is doing exactly? I guess it is producing the label map but when I see the image in ITK Snap I can see only red aand green patches in the image. Any help in this regard is greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: