-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements in ss.rr plots #8
Comments
As this bumps right into code I am currently looking at, I will take a look. In the ss.rr.R code each plot has a name attribute and a row and column attribute. I am thinking to define an optional argument and set all of those up in some form of variable (probably a matrix) at the top of the code which can be overwritten. |
I have an additional optional argument (layout) which is passed. It defaults to an empty matrix of 6 rows, 3 columns. In terms of building this argument in a call, here is a sample: The six variables are in the order in which the graphs are normally viewed.However, the rows and columns are reversed and this does reverse the order on the screen.bp <- c("Summarized Variation", 3, 2) layout <- rbind(bp,cr, cm, vbp, vba, pai) |
This is a call I wrote based off of someone else's Youtube video (I don't want anyone thinking I am plagiarizing, but I forgot whose video it was). I wanted one that was very simple. So, this file can either call with or without the customizations to make it easy for any to test and look (yes - the ss.R needs to be merged before this will work). One other note, as you play with customization remember that the 6th chart (part:appraiser) is not displayed if you set the method to "nested". Enjoy - and please feel free to give feedback or make corrections. |
User request for ss.rr:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: