-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plans #1
Comments
thanks @emilyamorris for organizing this thread I'm happy to start working on code folding / organizing / descriptions / anything else that comes up ! |
a couple questions: is anyone else having trouble knitting since the file is so large? also, @emilyamorris is the bit at the end the idea you had about possibly mapping incumbents vs challengers? trying to figure out where we can go next/ how I can be the most help |
It didn't take me very long to write that and I have another thing I wanna
add. I think it's maybe a better option to go with because we don't need to
use separate state maps and it does everything on the rubric but a
function. I'm going to write a function for another graph that looks at
states with the highest numbers of incumbent versus challenger winners.
If you wanna write a description for the first one at some point today that
would be super cool? Idk when we wanna meet up
Emily Morris
Smith College Biochemistry '19
Eamorris@smith.edu
215-421-0492 <(215)%20421-0492>
…On Mar 19, 2018 10:09 PM, "slednicky" ***@***.***> wrote:
a couple questions: is anyone else having trouble knitting since the file
is so large? also, @emilyamorris <https://github.com/emilyamorris> is the
bit at the end the idea you had about possibly mapping incumbents vs
challengers? trying to figure out where we can go next/ how I can be the
most help
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjXMkW3QvSrCrfbpYK7y99FeLxm_slXKks5tgGS9gaJpZM4SwWkJ>
.
|
yes, @emilyamorris I will do that later today! |
Ok i updated everything, we have 3 graphs now that I think are interesting,
lemme know what you think
Emily Morris
Smith College Biochemistry '19
Eamorris@smith.edu
215-421-0492
…On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, 2:30 PM slednicky ***@***.***> wrote:
yes, @emilyamorris <https://github.com/emilyamorris> I will do that later
today!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AjXMkQxXEwv8QL0L1iomIGXVLDZzca5Iks5tgUrFgaJpZM4SwWkJ>
.
|
I did some revising, feel free to edit though, especially the comparison between republican and democratic. I think there's prob some more intelligent things to say, I'm just not thinking of them atm. I will also come back to it later and take another look. Also, I'm not sure what to say under the "setting up the plot function" heading. thanks all !! |
Seems good so far @slednicky and @JuliaClaireLee
thank you for doing so many things over break @JuliaClaireLee !!!
We should change the function so the plot is a bit prettier, maybe make the information on it slightly clearer, but otherwise it's a really cool kind of information to show. There are definitely easy style things to change. Then we can apply it to the whole list of states and make sure we can see all the resulting 50 plots at once.
I'm going to work on making the function put out a prettier looking plot unless @JuliaClaireLee wants to. One of us needs to work on code folding and organizing, and one of us needs to write descriptions. I'm happy to do any of it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: