Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TERM REQUEST] CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticle #503

Closed
Tracked by #558
egonw opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #560
Closed
Tracked by #558

[TERM REQUEST] CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticle #503

egonw opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #560
Assignees
Labels
enhancement NanoCommons H2020 project SbD4Nano term request Label for term requests

Comments

@egonw
Copy link
Contributor

egonw commented Jan 14, 2024

What would you use as label or labels for the terms?
Annotate a dataset: https://zenodo.org/records/7989699

Quote:

CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticles were provided by Promethean Particles (EMR identifier in the project: ERM00000397).

What is the definition of the term?
Not sure.

Is there an ontology that has this term?
ENM and NPO both don't seem to have it.

@jmillanacosta
Copy link
Member

jmillanacosta commented Jan 15, 2024

Synonyms (from its safety sheet "CeO2 Co3O4 -SDS.pdf"):

  • CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticle
  • Cerium(IV)/Cobalt(II,III)
  • Tricobalt tetraoxide/cerium dioxide/ceria

Definition from its safety data sheet:

Cerium(IV)/Cobalt(II,III) mixture of oxide nanoparticles (in aqueous dispersion)

We have no clear way of modelling mixtures in the eNanoMapper. There is a mixture class (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_60004), a cerium oxide nanoparticle class (http://purl.enanomapper.org/onto/ENM_9000006), and a cobalt oxide nanoparticle class (http://purl.enanomapper.org/onto/ENM_0000119).

Possible solutions:

  • A: CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticle: subClassOf(mixture), subClassOf(CeO2 nanoparticle), subClassOf(Co3O4 nanoparticle). Simply state that it is a kind of all three, simple solution.
  • B: CeO2/Co3O4 nanoparticle: subClassOf(mixture), sameAs (has_part some CeO2 nanoparticle, has_part some Co3O4 nanoparticle), more expressive but also more complicated than the rest of similar classes in eNMO.

If we think of an approach like B it would be more in line with the plans to make the ontology more expressive.

@egonw thoughts? Maybe we can use A for now, but ideally move to B as we start defining the architectural ontology design patterns for all types of nanoparticles, nanoparticle mixtures, nanocomposites, nanomaterials, nanoobjects; if that's something we want to (or can) do.

@egonw
Copy link
Contributor Author

egonw commented Jan 15, 2024

Nice discussion for Feb 8!

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta added the term request Label for term requests label Mar 20, 2024
Copy link

Available IRI: http://purl.enanomapper.net/onto/ENM_9116388

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta linked a pull request Mar 20, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement NanoCommons H2020 project SbD4Nano term request Label for term requests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants