Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for ECP5 Versa-5G with Yosys/nextpnr/Trellis #1

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2019

Conversation

daveshah1
Copy link

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: David Shah <dave@ds0.me>
Signed-off-by: David Shah <dave@ds0.me>
Signed-off-by: David Shah <dave@ds0.me>
@enjoy-digital
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Happy to merge it, just one thing: i don't think we longer need the bit_to_svf.py script since we are generating the .svf with ecppack. If that's the case, can you just remove bit_to_svf.py?

@daveshah1
Copy link
Author

The bit_to_svf script is still used with the Diamond flow option (it already isn't used for the default Trellis flow). The alternative would be to ecpunpack and then ecppack the Diamond bitstream to generate the svf, if you think that would be better.

@enjoy-digital enjoy-digital merged commit 48b0425 into litex-hub:master May 5, 2019
@enjoy-digital
Copy link
Member

Ah yes sorry, i forgot about that. That's fine then. Thanks!

@daveshah1 daveshah1 deleted the ecp5 branch May 5, 2019 15:39
@kamejoko80 kamejoko80 mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2019
mithro pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2019
gregdavill pushed a commit to gregdavill/linux-on-litex-vexriscv that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2019
enjoy-digital pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2021
viktor-prutyanov pushed a commit to viktor-prutyanov/linux-on-litex-vexriscv that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2023
viktor-prutyanov pushed a commit to viktor-prutyanov/linux-on-litex-vexriscv that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants