Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(translator): Implement consistent hash table size in BackendTrafficPolicy #3440

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

aoledk
Copy link
Contributor

@aoledk aoledk commented May 20, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Implement consistent hash table size in BackendTrafficPolicy, follow up #3348

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #3272

Signed-off-by: Dingkang Li <dingkang1743@gmail.com>
@aoledk aoledk requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2024 07:37
Signed-off-by: Dingkang Li <dingkang1743@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 21, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.14286% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.12%. Comparing base (c348370) to head (abcff52).

Files Patch % Lines
internal/gatewayapi/backendtrafficpolicy.go 78.26% 4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3440      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.09%   67.12%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         166      166              
  Lines       19618    19632      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits        13163    13178      +15     
+ Misses       5504     5501       -3     
- Partials      951      953       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aoledk aoledk requested a review from shawnh2 May 23, 2024 10:38
arkodg
arkodg previously approved these changes May 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@arkodg arkodg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks !

@arkodg arkodg requested review from a team May 23, 2024 21:12
@shawnh2
Copy link
Contributor

shawnh2 commented May 24, 2024

LGTM! #3302 has introduced a new error processing way for BTP, can you update the code, then we are good to go!

@shawnh2
Copy link
Contributor

shawnh2 commented May 24, 2024

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@shawnh2 shawnh2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks

@aoledk
Copy link
Contributor Author

aoledk commented May 24, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@aoledk
Copy link
Contributor Author

aoledk commented May 24, 2024

/retest

@arkodg arkodg merged commit 6782d15 into envoyproxy:main May 24, 2024
24 of 26 checks passed
@aoledk aoledk deleted the consistent-hash-table-size-impl branch May 27, 2024 01:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support knob to configure consistent hash table size
3 participants