Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EEP statuses #52

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2023
Merged

Update EEP statuses #52

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2023

Conversation

RaimoNiskanen
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #48

eeps/eep-0048.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@williamthome williamthome left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if I understand the Post-History correctly, but has the Post-History some relevant importance? If not, please ignore my suggestions.

eeps/eep-0048.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0050.md Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0053.md Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0054.md Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0056.md Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0058.md Show resolved Hide resolved
eeps/eep-0061.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@RaimoNiskanen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@williamthome: I'd say Post-History is a field that is not very important, and often hard to use as originally intended.

The original intention, as per EEP 1 was to document when the topic was discussed on erlang-questions, an EEP was was supposed discussed before being submitted so there should only be left to approve or reject it.

It has turned out to be more common to write an EEP and then the discussion is about the content. I'd say this is a more reasonable process...

So we could redesign how the Post-History field should be used, and/or not use it.

@RaimoNiskanen RaimoNiskanen merged commit 24857cf into erlang:master Sep 8, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EEP48, EEP 58 and EEP 61 are outdated
4 participants