You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2020. It is now read-only.
It would be great if the library was compatible with PEP-0249 so we could for exemple create code tests using SQLite in memory and would be easier to make code compatible with other databases. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, that’s just some work to get there. But it’s definitely the “next big thing” when we get around to it.
Captain Hindsight says – It would have been better to follow Python DB API spec when implementing umysql in the first place
//JT
From: Gustavo Gawryszewski [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: den 12 juli 2013 15:13
To: esnme/ultramysql
Subject: [ultramysql] Make it compatible with pep-0249 (#37)
It would be great if the library was compatible with PEP-0249 so we could for exemple create code tests using SQLite in memory and would be easier to make code compatible with other databases. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/37.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
It would be great if the library was compatible with PEP-0249 so we could for exemple create code tests using SQLite in memory and would be easier to make code compatible with other databases. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: