Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update idf_monitor.py to make --toolchain-prefix argument work #617

Closed

Conversation

hwmaier
Copy link
Contributor

@hwmaier hwmaier commented May 17, 2017

--toolchain-prefix command line argument was not taken into account when specified

--toolchain-prefix command line argument was not taken into account when specified
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 17, 2017

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@projectgus
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Henrik, appreciate the fix. This looks like it fixes the --eol argument as well.

Have put this into our internal review & merge queue.

@projectgus projectgus added the Status: Pending blocked by some other factor label May 18, 2017
@hwmaier
Copy link
Contributor Author

hwmaier commented May 18, 2017

I don't have the gcc compiler in the path and depend on the configuration to point to the correct location. This is how I discovered this minor bug.

igrr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2017
--toolchain-prefix command line argument was not taken into account when specified

Merges #617
@igrr
Copy link
Member

igrr commented Jun 21, 2017

Thanks for the PR @hwmaier, it has been cherry picked as b95bef4.

@igrr igrr closed this Jun 21, 2017
@igrr igrr removed the Status: Pending blocked by some other factor label Nov 14, 2017
espressif-bot pushed a commit to espressif/esp-idf-monitor that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2023
--toolchain-prefix command line argument was not taken into account when specified

Merges espressif/esp-idf#617
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants