Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StaticQueue_t needs to have the same size as xQUEUE. #98

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danicampora
Copy link
Contributor

Without this change, building FreeRTOS with static allocation enabled succeeds, but trying to create a queue from a static buffer causes a runtime assert because the size of static and dynamic queues differ.

Without this change, building FreeRTOS with static allocation enabled succeeds, but trying to create a queue from a static buffer causes an assert because the size of static and dynamic queues differ.
@danicampora
Copy link
Contributor Author

@igrr @Spritetm have you been able to check this one? It's a no-brainer ;-)

@igrr
Copy link
Member

igrr commented Nov 23, 2016

Yes! It is merged and should be in Github master soon.

igrr added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2016
StaticQueue_t needs to have the same size as xQUEUE.

#98

Without this change, building FreeRTOS with static allocation enabled succeeds, but trying to create a queue from a static buffer causes an assert because the size of static and dynamic queues differ.

See merge request !236
@igrr
Copy link
Member

igrr commented Nov 24, 2016

Merged in 3830305, thanks.

@igrr igrr closed this Nov 24, 2016
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Opened Issue is new Resolution: Won't Do This will not be worked on Status: Done Issue is done internally and removed Status: Opened Issue is new labels Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: Won't Do This will not be worked on Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants