Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.4] backport #13359 Fix http2 authority header in single endpoint scenario #16988

Merged

Conversation

chaochn47
Copy link
Member

Breakdown of #16827

Backport #13359 (only e2e test is implemented, corresponding integration test is not deserved to be back-ported given its risk caused by large number of test code changes)

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

@chaochn47 chaochn47 force-pushed the release-3.4-backport-authority-header-fix branch from d5d7ef1 to 69e99aa Compare November 22, 2023 05:50
@chaochn47
Copy link
Member Author

Verified locally that the added e2e test is expected to fail without the fix and succeed with the fix.

@chaochn47 chaochn47 marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2023 05:51
@chaochn47
Copy link
Member Author

cc @ahrtr @serathius

tests/e2e/etcd_process.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…point scenario

Signed-off-by: Chao Chen <chaochn@amazon.com>
@chaochn47 chaochn47 force-pushed the release-3.4-backport-authority-header-fix branch from 69e99aa to 5c95ef3 Compare November 22, 2023 07:35
Copy link
Member

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with minor question

@@ -38,3 +43,23 @@ func spawnCmd(args []string) (*expect.ExpectProcess, error) {
}
return expect.NewExpectWithEnv(args[0], args[1:], env)
}

func mergeEnvVariables(envVars map[string]string) []string {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it from main branch?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

YES.

There is no function SpawnCmdWithLogger in releasae-3.4, and a new function spawnCmdWithEnv is added in this PR. It is a minor difference from the original PR. It should be OK.

Copy link
Member

@ahrtr ahrtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Thanks @chaochn47

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit fe68345 into etcd-io:release-3.4 Nov 22, 2023
12 checks passed
@ahrtr ahrtr mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2023
24 tasks
@chaochn47 chaochn47 deleted the release-3.4-backport-authority-header-fix branch November 22, 2023 17:11
fuweid added a commit to fuweid/etcd that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Assume etcd-io#16916 as baseline. The E2E takes `1395.082s`.

* etcd-io#16988

It introduced `TestAuthority` which takes `18.39s`.
And after etcd-io#16997, it takes `50.05s`.

* etcd-io#16995

It introduced `TestInPlaceRecovery` which takes `17.37s`.

* etcd-io#17144

  - New `TestHTTPHealthHandler` takes `29.9s`
  - New `TestHTTPLivezReadyzHandler` takes `35.20s`

* etcd-io#17173

  - New `TestMemberReplace` takes `7.55s`.

Ideally, it should increase `140.07s`. It's not larger than `1800s`
timeout value.

However, we run E2E cases 3 times. By default, we run E2E cases with
`-cpu 1,2,4`. That means that we run 3 times.

```bash
$ go help testflag

 -count n
            Run each test, benchmark, and fuzz seed n times (default 1).

            If -cpu is set, run n times for each GOMAXPROCS value.
            Examples are always run once. -count does not apply to
            fuzz tests matched by -fuzz.
```

I don't think we should run E2E with different GOMAXPROCS value. All the
`TestXYZ` are used to control etcd process and we don't set GOMAXPROCS
env to etcd process. So, we don't need `-cpu` setting for E2E.

Closes: etcd-io#17241

Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <fuweid89@gmail.com>
fuweid added a commit to fuweid/etcd that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Assume etcd-io#16916 as baseline. The E2E takes `1395.082s`.

* etcd-io#16988

It introduced `TestAuthority` which takes `18.39s`.
And after etcd-io#16997, it takes `50.05s`.

* etcd-io#16995

It introduced `TestInPlaceRecovery` which takes `17.37s`.

* etcd-io#17144

  - New `TestHTTPHealthHandler` takes `29.9s`
  - New `TestHTTPLivezReadyzHandler` takes `35.20s`

* etcd-io#17173

  - New `TestMemberReplace` takes `7.55s`.

Ideally, it should increase `140.07s`. It's not larger than `1800s`
timeout value.

However, we run E2E cases 3 times. By default, we run E2E cases with
`-cpu 1,2,4`. That means that we run 3 times.

`1395.082s` + `140.07s * 3` = `1815.292s` > `1800s`

```bash
$ go help testflag

 -count n
            Run each test, benchmark, and fuzz seed n times (default 1).

            If -cpu is set, run n times for each GOMAXPROCS value.
            Examples are always run once. -count does not apply to
            fuzz tests matched by -fuzz.
```

I don't think we should run E2E with different GOMAXPROCS value. All the
`TestXYZ` are used to control etcd process and we don't set GOMAXPROCS
env to etcd process. So, we don't need `-cpu` setting for E2E.

Closes: etcd-io#17241

Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <fuweid89@gmail.com>
fuweid added a commit to fuweid/etcd that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Assume etcd-io#16916 as baseline. The E2E takes `1395.082s`.

* etcd-io#16988

It introduced `TestAuthority` which takes `18.39s`.
And after etcd-io#16997, it takes `50.05s`.

* etcd-io#16995

It introduced `TestInPlaceRecovery` which takes `17.37s`.

* etcd-io#17144

  - New `TestHTTPHealthHandler` takes `29.9s`
  - New `TestHTTPLivezReadyzHandler` takes `35.20s`

* etcd-io#17173

  - New `TestMemberReplace` takes `7.55s`.

Ideally, it should increase `140.07s`. It's not larger than `1800s`
timeout value.

However, we run E2E cases 3 times. By default, we run E2E cases with
`-cpu 1,2,4`. That means that we run 3 times.

`1395.082s` + `140.07s * 3` = `1815.292s` > `1800s`

```bash
$ go help testflag

 -count n
            Run each test, benchmark, and fuzz seed n times (default 1).

            If -cpu is set, run n times for each GOMAXPROCS value.
            Examples are always run once. -count does not apply to
            fuzz tests matched by -fuzz.
```

I don't think we should run E2E with different GOMAXPROCS value. All the
`TestXYZ` are used to control etcd process and we don't set GOMAXPROCS
env to etcd process.

Set `CPU=4` to align with main and release/3.5.

Closes: etcd-io#17241

Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <fuweid89@gmail.com>
fuweid added a commit to fuweid/etcd that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Assume etcd-io#16916 as baseline. The E2E takes `1395.082s`.

* etcd-io#16988

It introduced `TestAuthority` which takes `18.39s`.
And after etcd-io#16997, it takes `50.05s`.

* etcd-io#16995

It introduced `TestInPlaceRecovery` which takes `17.37s`.

* etcd-io#17144

  - New `TestHTTPHealthHandler` takes `29.9s`
  - New `TestHTTPLivezReadyzHandler` takes `35.20s`

* etcd-io#17173

  - New `TestMemberReplace` takes `7.55s`.

Ideally, it should increase `140.07s`. It's not larger than `1800s`
timeout value.

However, we run E2E cases 3 times. By default, we run E2E cases with
`-cpu 1,2,4`. That means that we run 3 times.

`1395.082s` + `140.07s * 3` = `1815.292s` > `1800s`

```bash
$ go help testflag

 -count n
            Run each test, benchmark, and fuzz seed n times (default 1).

            If -cpu is set, run n times for each GOMAXPROCS value.
            Examples are always run once. -count does not apply to
            fuzz tests matched by -fuzz.
```

I don't think we should run E2E with different GOMAXPROCS value. All the
`TestXYZ` are used to control etcd process and we don't set GOMAXPROCS
env to etcd process.

Set `CPU=4` to align with main and release/3.5.

Closes: etcd-io#17241

Signed-off-by: Wei Fu <fuweid89@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants