Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ERC-5169: Add contributing author #184

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JamesSmartCell
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is to add an author who contributed to the original concept.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Jan 4, 2024

File ERCS/erc-5169.md

Requires 2 more reviewers from @axic, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Add contributing author Update ERC-5169: Add contributing author Jan 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@xinbenlv xinbenlv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Existing lead author wants to add another author, I don't seem obvious concern

@xinbenlv xinbenlv enabled auto-merge (squash) January 8, 2024 16:24
@xinbenlv xinbenlv marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2024 16:25
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 8, 2024 16:25

Pull request was converted to draft

@xinbenlv xinbenlv marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2024 16:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is final, so we should probably do a Call for Input.

@SamWilsn
Copy link
Collaborator

SamWilsn commented Feb 9, 2024

As discussed on ethcatherders/EIPIP#308, the prevailing opinion among editors is to not modify a final proposal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants