-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change RobotModel.forward_kinematics() interface #94
Conversation
I think the typing makes sense given our current context. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added some comments after going through the IK test.
Overall I think the direction of this interface looks really good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm, thanks for iterating through with us!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
* Change RobotModel.forward_kinematics() interface. * Removed unnecessary if statement in IdentityModel. * Changed RobotModel.forward_kinematics() so that output is always a dict.
Motivation and Context
As discussed in #84