Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(k8saudit-gke): describe scaling options for high audit log volumes #454

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

sboschman
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area plugins

/area registry

/area build

/area documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adding some notes on processing high audit log volumes with k8saudit-gke.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Signed-off-by: Sverre Boschman <1142569+sboschman@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

Rules files suggestions

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Apr 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jasondellaluce, sboschman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Apr 2, 2024

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 44dcd83db2dbcf40392ee61f2f16822743f21679

@poiana poiana merged commit 5ab853d into falcosecurity:main Apr 2, 2024
12 checks passed
@sboschman sboschman deleted the docs-scaling-k8saudit-gke branch April 26, 2024 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants