Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Prow autobumper #856

Closed
maxgio92 opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

Upgrade Prow autobumper #856

maxgio92 opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 8 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@maxgio92
Copy link
Member

maxgio92 commented Sep 21, 2022

Motivation

Open Infra is using the previous version of the Kubernetes Prow autobumper, which is suboptimal based on functionalities and the fact that is not actively maintained.

Feature

We can reference the new Prow Autobumper and using it as artifact - as done here.

Improvement

This way requires in any case to statically declare the periodic Jobs for each repository that contains Prow component configuration (e.g. Peribolos) explicitely, and it's error prone.

It would be good to find a way to autobump Prow components dynamically discovering all the repositories that use them (i.e. now, test-infra and evolution).

Related

See #840

@maxgio92 maxgio92 changed the title Update Prow autobumper Upgrade Prow autobumper Sep 21, 2022
@maxgio92
Copy link
Member Author

cc @zuc

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Dec 20, 2022

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.

Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.

/lifecycle stale

@maxgio92
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@maxgio92 maxgio92 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 15, 2023
@maxgio92
Copy link
Member Author

I think this has been completed, isn't it @cappellinsamuele?

@cappellinsamuele
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, almost completed! I'd wait for #1132 and #1133 to be merged before closing this issue, WDYT?

@maxgio92
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, I agree!

@maxgio92
Copy link
Member Author

/close

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Aug 11, 2023

@maxgio92: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@poiana poiana closed this as completed Aug 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants