Search results

Missing explicit datatype for string fields

Status: Open.

#18 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· dennisvang opened on Jun 10, 2025

Include normative SHACL files in fdp-specs repository

Status: Open.

#17 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· dennisvang opened on Apr 11, 2025

Issue inconsistency of the fdp-o:hasSoftwareVersion and the fdp-o:fdpSoftwareVersion

Status: Open.

#16 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· svituz opened on Apr 2, 2025

What is a profile?

Status: Open.

#15 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· dennisvang opened on Jan 15, 2025

Inconsistent description of mandatory digital objects

Status: Open.

#14 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· dennisvang opened on Jan 15, 2025

Is the MIT license designed for software an appropiate license for a specification?

Status: Open.

#12 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· JervenBolleman opened on Mar 12, 2024

FPO ontology uses inconsistent IRIs for contributors

Status: Open.

#11 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· JervenBolleman opened on Mar 12, 2024

fdpo metataIssued etc. should likely be deprecated and we should just use dcterms:issued etc.

Status: Open.

#10 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· JervenBolleman opened on Mar 12, 2024

Specs indicate fdp-o:conformsToFdpSpec is mandatory, but nobody uses it

Status: Open.

#9 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· ifokkema opened on Sep 27, 2023

How to use <code>dct:conformsTo</code>?

Status: Open.

#5 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· ifokkema opened on Aug 9, 2023

Inconsistency in <code>issued</code>/<code>modified</code> properties.

Status: Open.

#3 In fdp-specs/fdp-specs.github.io;

· ifokkema opened on Aug 9, 2023