Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: docs: remove unused badge from the README #12097

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

galargh
Copy link
Contributor

@galargh galargh commented Jun 16, 2024

Related Issues

https://ipdx-workspace.slack.com/archives/CP50PPW2X/p1718485685713539

Proposed Changes

Remove the unused badge.

Additional Info

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • If the PR affects users (e.g., new feature, bug fix, system requirements change), update the CHANGELOG.md and add details to the UNRELEASED section.
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 16, 2024

All checks have passed

Copy link
Contributor

@rjan90 rjan90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@rjan90 rjan90 merged commit 496ea6d into master Jun 16, 2024
77 checks passed
@rjan90 rjan90 deleted the ipdx/unused-badge branch June 16, 2024 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants