Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Db contrib/waltz 7047 add inbound ratings to flow view and euma select #7057

Conversation

davidwatkins73
Copy link
Member

- update export to show both ratings

#CTCTOWALTZ-3094
finos#7053
- Update styling on data type tree
- Display both source outbound ratings and target inbound ratings on decorators

#CTCTOWALTZ-3094
finos#7053
- Fix logical flow view to work with actors / eumas
- Added in some timers as performance for loading rating characteristics and adding decorators is still slow ~ 7/8 seconds

#CTCTOWALTZ-3094
finos#7053
Remove the edit section for logical flow overview and replace with data types list

#CTCTOWALTZ-3094
finos#7053
… 7047

Merge in WALTZ/waltz from WALTZ/waltz-jws:CTCTOWALTZ-3094-inbound-ratings-visualisation-7047 to db-feature/waltz-7047-add-inbound-ratings-to-flow-view-and-euma-select

* commit 'ce8074838770bd932551095647382df9ea032c0a':
  Drop in new data type editor to the flow edit panel
  Update the rating characteristics to a single indicator cell
  Update the rating characteristics to a single indicator cell
  Add euma selector to logical flow editor (app view)
  Add euma selector to logical flow editor (app view)
  Return rating classifications for source and target
@davidwatkins73 davidwatkins73 merged commit f216f8e into finos:master Apr 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@davidwatkins73 davidwatkins73 deleted the db-contrib/waltz-7047-add-inbound-ratings-to-flow-view-and-euma-select branch April 23, 2024 15:17
@deutschebank-sync deutschebank-sync restored the db-contrib/waltz-7047-add-inbound-ratings-to-flow-view-and-euma-select branch April 23, 2024 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants