Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed Rule 306: Incentivize timeliness #15

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2016
Merged

Proposed Rule 306: Incentivize timeliness #15

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2016

Conversation

eglenn
Copy link
Collaborator

@eglenn eglenn commented Dec 17, 2013

My proposed Rule 306 amends the points system to encourage all players to vote in a timely manner. After a vote is tallied, points are awarded to all players, but those who vote sooner get more.

@fkh
Copy link
Owner

fkh commented Dec 17, 2013

I vote yes.

@eglenn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eglenn commented Dec 17, 2013

Living proof that this incentive strategy will work! Get in now,
while the points are high!

--Ezra

At Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:11:18 -0800, Andy Cochran wrote:

[1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]

[2 <text/html; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
I vote yes.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.*

Ezra Haber Glenn, AICP
Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Ave., Room 7-337
Cambridge, MA 02139
eglenn@mit.edu
http://dusp.mit.edu/faculty/ezra-glenn | http://eglenn.scripts.mit.edu/citystate/
617.253.2024 (w)
617.721.7131 (c)

@dominicmauro
Copy link
Contributor

I also vote yes.

@fkh
Copy link
Owner

fkh commented Dec 17, 2013

I do wonder about the impact on legitimate debate around proposals, but we can introduce remedies in the future to deal with this if the problem arises.

I also wonder about vacations, like the one @andycochran is on right now.

@eglenn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eglenn commented Dec 18, 2013

As for vacations, I suppose (1) with advance notice, the upcoming rule
proposer could just hold off on proposing -- there is no penalty for
untimely rule proposals; (2) a player could store up points in
preparation for a vacation; and/or (3) we could decide that a vacation
is actually a more appropriate time to be playing a game, and it's
actually the folks who are at work who need extra time....

--Ezra

At Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:30:20 -0800, Andy Cochran wrote:

[1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]

[2 <text/html; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
I do wonder about the impact on legitimate debate around proposals, but we can introduce
remedies in the future to deal with this if the problem arises.

I also wonder about vacations, like the one @andycochran is on right now.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.*

Ezra Haber Glenn, AICP
Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Ave., Room 7-337
Cambridge, MA 02139
eglenn@mit.edu
http://dusp.mit.edu/faculty/ezra-glenn | http://eglenn.scripts.mit.edu/citystate/
617.253.2024 (w)
617.721.7131 (c)

@andycochran
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. (Vacation is the time for games.)

@fkh
Copy link
Owner

fkh commented Jan 3, 2014

What does @bensteinberg think?

@bensteinberg
Copy link

Ha! Timeliness. I was on vacation, and even pushing code to github, and somehow missed all this. I vote yes.

@andycochran
Copy link
Contributor

🕚 😴

@fkh fkh merged commit 73aac31 into fkh:master Jul 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants