Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

error compiling: drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.o no such file or directory #2

Closed
theoneandonly-vector opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

error compiling: drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.o no such file or directory #2

theoneandonly-vector opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@theoneandonly-vector
Copy link

CC drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.o
drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.c:26:23: fatal error: btfm_slim.h: No such file or directory
#include <btfm_slim.h>
^
compilation terminated.
scripts/Makefile.build:336: recipe for target 'drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.o' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/bluetooth/btfm_slim.o] Error 1
scripts/Makefile.build:650: recipe for target 'drivers/bluetooth' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/bluetooth] Error 2
Makefile:1087: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
@theoneandonly-vector
Copy link
Author

I'm not exactly sure what I did wrong as it's working now on a fresh setup.

@theoneandonly-vector
Copy link
Author

but there are still errors compiling it:
Makefile:152: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed

kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@kimocoder
md: don't flush workqueue unconditionally in md_open
7b00ddb 
[ Upstream commit f6766ff6afff70e2aaf39e1511e16d471de7c3ae ]

We need to check mddev->del_work before flush workqueu since the purpose
of flush is to ensure the previous md is disappeared. Otherwise the similar
deadlock appeared if LOCKDEP is enabled, it is due to md_open holds the
bdev->bd_mutex before flush workqueue.

kernel: [  154.522645] ======================================================
kernel: [  154.522647] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
kernel: [  154.522650] 5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25 Tainted: G           O
kernel: [  154.522651] ------------------------------------------------------
kernel: [  154.522653] mdadm/2482 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: [  154.522655] ffff888078529128 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522673]
kernel: [  154.522673] but task is already holding lock:
kernel: [  154.522675] ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522691]
kernel: [  154.522691] which lock already depends on the new lock.
kernel: [  154.522691]
kernel: [  154.522694]
kernel: [  154.522694] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
kernel: [  154.522696]
kernel: [  154.522696] -> flar2#4 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522704]        __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950
kernel: [  154.522706]        __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522708]        blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522709]        blkdev_get_by_dev+0x2f/0x40
kernel: [  154.522716]        lock_rdev+0x3d/0x90 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522719]        md_import_device+0xd6/0x1b0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522723]        new_dev_store+0x15e/0x210 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522728]        md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522732]        kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522735]        vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522737]        ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0
kernel: [  154.522745]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522748]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522749]
kernel: [  154.522749] -> flar2#3 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522752]        __mutex_lock+0x87/0x950
kernel: [  154.522756]        new_dev_store+0xc9/0x210 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522759]        md_attr_store+0x7a/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522761]        kernfs_fop_write+0x117/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522763]        vfs_write+0xad/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522765]        ksys_write+0xa4/0xe0
kernel: [  154.522767]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522769]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522770]
kernel: [  154.522770] -> flar2#2 (kn->count#253){++++}:
kernel: [  154.522775]        __kernfs_remove+0x253/0x2c0
kernel: [  154.522778]        kernfs_remove+0x1f/0x30
kernel: [  154.522780]        kobject_del+0x28/0x60
kernel: [  154.522783]        mddev_delayed_delete+0x24/0x30 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522786]        process_one_work+0x2a7/0x5f0
kernel: [  154.522788]        worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
kernel: [  154.522793]        kthread+0x117/0x130
kernel: [  154.522795]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
kernel: [  154.522796]
kernel: [  154.522796] -> flar2#1 ((work_completion)(&mddev->del_work)){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522800]        process_one_work+0x27e/0x5f0
kernel: [  154.522802]        worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
kernel: [  154.522804]        kthread+0x117/0x130
kernel: [  154.522806]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
kernel: [  154.522807]
kernel: [  154.522807] -> #0 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}:
kernel: [  154.522813]        __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522816]        lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522818]        flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522821]        md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522823]        __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590
kernel: [  154.522825]        blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522828]        do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380
kernel: [  154.522831]        path_openat+0x567/0xcc0
kernel: [  154.522834]        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110
kernel: [  154.522836]        do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522838]        do_sys_open+0x57/0x80
kernel: [  154.522840]        do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522842]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522844]
kernel: [  154.522844] other info that might help us debug this:
kernel: [  154.522844]
kernel: [  154.522846] Chain exists of:
kernel: [  154.522846]   (wq_completion)md_misc --> &mddev->reconfig_mutex --> &bdev->bd_mutex
kernel: [  154.522846]
kernel: [  154.522850]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
kernel: [  154.522850]
kernel: [  154.522852]        CPU0                    CPU1
kernel: [  154.522853]        ----                    ----
kernel: [  154.522854]   lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522856]                                lock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522858]                                lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
kernel: [  154.522860]   lock((wq_completion)md_misc);
kernel: [  154.522861]
kernel: [  154.522861]  *** DEADLOCK ***
kernel: [  154.522861]
kernel: [  154.522864] 1 lock held by mdadm/2482:
kernel: [  154.522865]  #0: ffff88804efa9338 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x79/0x590
kernel: [  154.522868]
kernel: [  154.522868] stack backtrace:
kernel: [  154.522873] CPU: 1 PID: 2482 Comm: mdadm Tainted: G           O      5.6.0-rc7-lp151.27-default #25
kernel: [  154.522875] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
kernel: [  154.522878] Call Trace:
kernel: [  154.522881]  dump_stack+0x8f/0xcb
kernel: [  154.522884]  check_noncircular+0x194/0x1b0
kernel: [  154.522888]  ? __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522890]  __lock_acquire+0x1392/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522893]  lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1a0
kernel: [  154.522895]  ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522898]  flush_workqueue+0xab/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522900]  ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x4b0
kernel: [  154.522905]  ? md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522908]  md_open+0xb6/0xc0 [md_mod]
kernel: [  154.522910]  __blkdev_get+0xea/0x590
kernel: [  154.522912]  ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0
kernel: [  154.522914]  blkdev_get+0x65/0x140
kernel: [  154.522916]  ? bd_acquire+0xc0/0xc0
kernel: [  154.522918]  do_dentry_open+0x1d1/0x380
kernel: [  154.522921]  path_openat+0x567/0xcc0
kernel: [  154.522923]  ? __lock_acquire+0x380/0x1690
kernel: [  154.522926]  do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110
kernel: [  154.522929]  ? __alloc_fd+0xe5/0x1f0
kernel: [  154.522935]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x28c/0x630
kernel: [  154.522939]  ? do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522941]  do_sys_openat2+0x201/0x2a0
kernel: [  154.522944]  do_sys_open+0x57/0x80
kernel: [  154.522946]  do_syscall_64+0x64/0x2b0
kernel: [  154.522948]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
kernel: [  154.522951] RIP: 0033:0x7f98d279d9ae

And md_alloc also flushed the same workqueue, but the thing is different
here. Because all the paths call md_alloc don't hold bdev->bd_mutex, and
the flush is necessary to avoid race condition, so leave it as it is.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@JasonYanHw @kimocoder
block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get()
344715a 
[ Upstream commit 2d3a8e2deddea6c89961c422ec0c5b851e648c14 ]

In blkdev_get() we call __blkdev_get() to do some internal jobs and if
there is some errors in __blkdev_get(), the bdput() is called which
means we have released the refcount of the bdev (actually the refcount of
the bdev inode). This means we cannot access bdev after that point. But
acctually bdev is still accessed in blkdev_get() after calling
__blkdev_get(). This results in use-after-free if the refcount is the
last one we released in __blkdev_get(). Let's take a look at the
following scenerio:

  CPU0            CPU1                    CPU2
blkdev_open     blkdev_open           Remove disk
                  bd_acquire
		  blkdev_get
		    __blkdev_get      del_gendisk
					bdev_unhash_inode
  bd_acquire          bdev_get_gendisk
    bd_forget           failed because of unhashed
	  bdput
	              bdput (the last one)
		        bdev_evict_inode

	  	    access bdev => use after free

[  459.350216] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.351190] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88806c815a80 by task syz-executor.0/20132
[  459.352347]
[  459.352594] CPU: 0 PID: 20132 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 flar2#2
[  459.353628] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[  459.354947] Call Trace:
[  459.355337]  dump_stack+0x111/0x19e
[  459.355879]  ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.356523]  print_address_description+0x60/0x223
[  459.357248]  ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.357887]  kasan_report.cold+0xae/0x2d8
[  459.358503]  __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.359120]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
[  459.359784]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x37b/0x580
[  459.360465]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
[  459.361123]  ? finish_task_switch+0x125/0x600
[  459.361812]  ? finish_task_switch+0xee/0x600
[  459.362471]  ? mark_held_locks+0xf0/0xf0
[  459.363108]  ? __schedule+0x96f/0x21d0
[  459.363716]  lock_acquire+0x111/0x320
[  459.364285]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.364846]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.365390]  __mutex_lock+0xf9/0x12a0
[  459.365948]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.366493]  ? bdev_evict_inode+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  459.367130]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.367678]  ? destroy_inode+0xbc/0x110
[  459.368261]  ? mutex_trylock+0x1a0/0x1a0
[  459.368867]  ? __blkdev_get+0x3e6/0x1280
[  459.369463]  ? bdev_disk_changed+0x1d0/0x1d0
[  459.370114]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.370656]  blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.371178]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
[  459.371774]  ? __blkdev_get+0x1280/0x1280
[  459.372383]  ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680
[  459.373002]  ? lock_acquire+0x111/0x320
[  459.373587]  ? bd_acquire+0x21/0x2c0
[  459.374134]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250
[  459.374780]  blkdev_open+0x202/0x290
[  459.375325]  do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050
[  459.375924]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev+0x70/0x70
[  459.376543]  ? __x64_sys_fchdir+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  459.377192]  ? inode_permission+0xbe/0x3a0
[  459.377818]  path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50
[  459.378392]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280
[  459.379016]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.379802]  ? path_lookupat.isra.0+0x900/0x900
[  459.380489]  ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140
[  459.381093]  do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280
[  459.381654]  ? may_open_dev+0xf0/0xf0
[  459.382214]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
[  459.382816]  ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680
[  459.383425]  ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140
[  459.384024]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250
[  459.384668]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
[  459.385280]  ? __alloc_fd+0x448/0x560
[  459.385841]  do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500
[  459.386386]  ? filp_open+0x70/0x70
[  459.386911]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[  459.387610]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x55/0x1c0
[  459.388342]  ? do_syscall_64+0x1a/0x520
[  459.388930]  do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520
[  459.389490]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.390248] RIP: 0033:0x416211
[  459.390720] Code: 75 14 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83
04 19 00 00 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 0a fa ff ff 48 89 04 24 b8 02 00 00 00 0f
   05 <48> 8b 3c 24 48 89 c2 e8 53 fa ff ff 48 89 d0 48 83 c4 08 48 3d
      01
[  459.393483] RSP: 002b:00007fe45dfe9a60 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
[  459.394610] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe45dfea6d4 RCX: 0000000000416211
[  459.395678] RDX: 00007fe45dfe9b0a RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fe45dfe9b00
[  459.396758] RBP: 000000000076bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000a
[  459.397930] R10: 0000000000000075 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00000000ffffffff
[  459.399022] R13: 0000000000000bd9 R14: 00000000004cdb80 R15: 000000000076bf2c
[  459.400168]
[  459.400430] Allocated by task 20132:
[  459.401038]  kasan_kmalloc+0xbf/0xe0
[  459.401652]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280
[  459.402330]  bdev_alloc_inode+0x18/0x40
[  459.402970]  alloc_inode+0x5f/0x180
[  459.403510]  iget5_locked+0x57/0xd0
[  459.404095]  bdget+0x94/0x4e0
[  459.404607]  bd_acquire+0xfa/0x2c0
[  459.405113]  blkdev_open+0x110/0x290
[  459.405702]  do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050
[  459.406340]  path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50
[  459.406926]  do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280
[  459.407471]  do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500
[  459.408010]  do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520
[  459.408572]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.409415]
[  459.409679] Freed by task 1262:
[  459.410212]  __kasan_slab_free+0x129/0x170
[  459.410919]  kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x2a0
[  459.411564]  rcu_process_callbacks+0xbb2/0x2320
[  459.412318]  __do_softirq+0x225/0x8ac

Fix this by delaying bdput() to the end of blkdev_get() which means we
have finished accessing bdev.

Fixes: 77ea887 ("implement in-kernel gendisk events handling")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@biger410 @kimocoder
ocfs2: fix panic on nfs server over ocfs2
b375aee 
commit e5a15e17a78d58f933d17cafedfcf7486a29f5b4 upstream.

The following kernel panic was captured when running nfs server over
ocfs2, at that time ocfs2_test_inode_bit() was checking whether one
inode locating at "blkno" 5 was valid, that is ocfs2 root inode, its
"suballoc_slot" was OCFS2_INVALID_SLOT(65535) and it was allocted from
//global_inode_alloc, but here it wrongly assumed that it was got from per
slot inode alloctor which would cause array overflow and trigger kernel
panic.

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001088
  IP: [<ffffffff816f6898>] _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0
  PGD 1e06ba067 PUD 1e9e7d067 PMD 0
  Oops: 0002 [flar2#1] SMP
  CPU: 6 PID: 24873 Comm: nfsd Not tainted 4.1.12-124.36.1.el6uek.x86_64 flar2#2
  Hardware name: Huawei CH121 V3/IT11SGCA1, BIOS 3.87 02/02/2018
  RIP: _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0
  RSP: e02b:ffff88005ae97908  EFLAGS: 00010206
  RAX: ffff88005ae98000 RBX: 0000000000001088 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 0000000000001088
  RBP: ffff88005ae97928 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff880212878e00
  R10: 0000000000007ff0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001088
  R13: ffff8800063c0aa8 R14: ffff8800650c27d0 R15: 000000000000ffff
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880218180000(0000) knlGS:ffff880218180000
  CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 0000000000001088 CR3: 00000002033d0000 CR4: 0000000000042660
  Call Trace:
    igrab+0x1e/0x60
    ocfs2_get_system_file_inode+0x63/0x3a0 [ocfs2]
    ocfs2_test_inode_bit+0x328/0xa00 [ocfs2]
    ocfs2_get_parent+0xba/0x3e0 [ocfs2]
    reconnect_path+0xb5/0x300
    exportfs_decode_fh+0xf6/0x2b0
    fh_verify+0x350/0x660 [nfsd]
    nfsd4_putfh+0x4d/0x60 [nfsd]
    nfsd4_proc_compound+0x3d3/0x6f0 [nfsd]
    nfsd_dispatch+0xe0/0x290 [nfsd]
    svc_process_common+0x412/0x6a0 [sunrpc]
    svc_process+0x123/0x210 [sunrpc]
    nfsd+0xff/0x170 [nfsd]
    kthread+0xcb/0xf0
    ret_from_fork+0x61/0x90
  Code: 83 c2 02 0f b7 f2 e8 18 dc 91 ff 66 90 eb bf 0f 1f 40 00 55 48 89 e5 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 fb ba 00 00 02 00 <f0> 0f c1 17 89 d0 45 31 e4 45 31 ed c1 e8 10 66 39 d0 41 89 c6
  RIP   _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0xf0
  CR2: 0000000000001088
  ---[ end trace 7264463cd1aac8f9 ]---
  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616183829.87211-4-junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2021
@dianders @kimocoder
kgdb: Avoid suspicious RCU usage warning
529722a 
[ Upstream commit 440ab9e10e2e6e5fd677473ee6f9e3af0f6904d6 ]

At times when I'm using kgdb I see a splat on my console about
suspicious RCU usage.  I managed to come up with a case that could
reproduce this that looked like this:

  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  5.7.0-rc4+ #609 Not tainted
  -----------------------------
  kernel/pid.c:395 find_task_by_pid_ns() needs rcu_read_lock() protection!

  other info that might help us debug this:

    rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
   #0: ffffff81b6b8e988 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach+0x40/0x13c
   flar2#1: ffffffd01109e9e8 (dbg_master_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kgdb_cpu_enter+0x20c/0x7ac
   flar2#2: ffffffd01109ea90 (dbg_slave_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kgdb_cpu_enter+0x3ec/0x7ac

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc4+ #609
  Hardware name: Google Cheza (rev3+) (DT)
  Call trace:
   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b8
   show_stack+0x1c/0x24
   dump_stack+0xd4/0x134
   lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xf0/0x100
   find_task_by_pid_ns+0x5c/0x80
   getthread+0x8c/0xb0
   gdb_serial_stub+0x9d4/0xd04
   kgdb_cpu_enter+0x284/0x7ac
   kgdb_handle_exception+0x174/0x20c
   kgdb_brk_fn+0x24/0x30
   call_break_hook+0x6c/0x7c
   brk_handler+0x20/0x5c
   do_debug_exception+0x1c8/0x22c
   el1_sync_handler+0x3c/0xe4
   el1_sync+0x7c/0x100
   rpmh_rsc_probe+0x38/0x420
   platform_drv_probe+0x94/0xb4
   really_probe+0x134/0x300
   driver_probe_device+0x68/0x100
   __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xa8
   bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xcc
   __device_attach+0xb4/0x13c
   device_initial_probe+0x18/0x20
   bus_probe_device+0x38/0x98
   device_add+0x38c/0x420

If I understand properly we should just be able to blanket kgdb under
one big RCU read lock and the problem should go away.  We'll add it to
the beast-of-a-function known as kgdb_cpu_enter().

With this I no longer get any splats and things seem to work fine.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200602154729.v2.1.I70e0d4fd46d5ed2aaf0c98a355e8e1b7a5bb7e4e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@kimocoder
tools lib traceevent: Fix memory leak in process_dynamic_array_len
be59ad8 
[ Upstream commit e24c6447ccb7b1a01f9bf0aec94939e6450c0b4d ]

I compiled with AddressSanitizer and I had these memory leaks while I
was using the tep_parse_format function:

    Direct leak of 28 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7fb07db49ffe in __interceptor_realloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dffe)
        flar2#1 0x7fb07a724228 in extend_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:985
        flar2#2 0x7fb07a724c21 in __read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1140
        flar2#3 0x7fb07a724f78 in read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1206
        flar2#4 0x7fb07a725191 in __read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1291
        flar2#5 0x7fb07a7251df in read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1299
        flar2#6 0x7fb07a72e6c8 in process_dynamic_array_len /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:2849
        flar2#7 0x7fb07a7304b8 in process_function /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3161
        flar2#8 0x7fb07a730900 in process_arg_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3207
        #9 0x7fb07a727c0b in process_arg /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1786
        #10 0x7fb07a731080 in event_read_print_args /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3285
        #11 0x7fb07a731722 in event_read_print /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3369
        #12 0x7fb07a740054 in __tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6335
        #13 0x7fb07a74047a in __parse_event /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6389
        #14 0x7fb07a740536 in tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6431
        #15 0x7fb07a785acf in parse_event ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:251
        #16 0x7fb07a785ccd in parse_systems ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:284
        #17 0x7fb07a786fb3 in read_metadata ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:593
        #18 0x7fb07a78760e in ftrace_fs_source_init ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:727
        #19 0x7fb07d90c19c in add_component_with_init_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1048
        #20 0x7fb07d90c87b in add_source_component_with_initialize_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1127
        #21 0x7fb07d90c92a in bt_graph_add_source_component ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1152
        #22 0x55db11aa632e in cmd_run_ctx_create_components_from_config_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2252
        #23 0x55db11aa6fda in cmd_run_ctx_create_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2347
        #24 0x55db11aa780c in cmd_run ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2461
        #25 0x55db11aa8a7d in main ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2673
        #26 0x7fb07d5460b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)

The token variable in the process_dynamic_array_len function is
allocated in the read_expect_type function, but is not freed before
calling the read_token function.

Free the token variable before calling read_token in order to plug the
leak.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <pduplessis@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20200730150236.5392-1-pduplessis@efficios.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@dinghaoliu @kimocoder
ALSA: echoaudio: Fix potential Oops in snd_echo_resume()
4e7719b 
[ Upstream commit 5a25de6df789cc805a9b8ba7ab5deef5067af47e ]

Freeing chip on error may lead to an Oops at the next time
the system goes to resume. Fix this by removing all
snd_echo_free() calls on error.

Fixes: 47b5d02 ("ALSA: Echoaudio - Add suspend support flar2#2")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200813074632.17022-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@sergey-senozhatsky @kimocoder
serial: 8250: change lock order in serial8250_do_startup()
79a4f11 
commit 205d300aea75623e1ae4aa43e0d265ab9cf195fd upstream.

We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port"
lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble
to people, so let's fix it.

The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths:

chain flar2#1:

 serial8250_do_startup()
  spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);
   disable_irq_nosync(port->irq);
    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)

chain flar2#2:

  __report_bad_irq()
   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)
    for_each_action_of_desc()
     printk()
      spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);

Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup():
 do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab
 uart->port after that, so that chain flar2#1 and chain flar2#2 have same lock
 order.

Full lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.4.39 #55 Not tainted
 ======================================================

 swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> flar2#2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89
        __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93
        serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c
        uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff
        uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0
        tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a
        uart_open+0x1b/0x26
        tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0
        chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc
        do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8
        path_openat+0x434/0x1100
        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a
        do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7
        kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> flar2#1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0
        console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        register_console+0x336/0x3a4
        uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be
        serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e
        dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9
        platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b
        really_probe+0x14a/0x422
        driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130
        device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b
        __driver_attach+0xca/0x139
        bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9
        bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228
        driver_register+0x64/0xed
        do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6
        do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5
        do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58
        kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}:
        __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
        lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
        console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
        console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
        note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
        handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
        handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
        handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
        do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
        ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d
        cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd
        cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d
        do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce
        cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f
        start_kernel+0x406/0x46a
        secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
                                lock(&port_lock_key);
                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(console_owner);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
  #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba
  flar2#1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 #55
 Hardware name: XXXXXX
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack+0xbf/0x133
  ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9
  check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3
  __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
  lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
  ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e
  vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
  ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  printk+0x59/0x73
  __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
  note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
  handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
  do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
  </IRQ>

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@josefbacik @kimocoder
btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
237a88d 
[ Upstream commit a48b73eca4ceb9b8a4b97f290a065335dbcd8a04 ]

With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> flar2#2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
	 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
	 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> flar2#1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
	 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
	 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
	 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-fs-00);
				 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
				 lock(btrfs-fs-00);
    lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by compsize/11122:
   #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
   __might_fault+0x68/0x90
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
   copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
   ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
   search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
   btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
   btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
   ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@namhyung @kimocoder
perf test: Free formats for perf pmu parse test
033f60c 
[ Upstream commit d26383dcb2b4b8629fde05270b4e3633be9e3d4b ]

The following leaks were detected by ASAN:

  Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
    flar2#1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
    flar2#2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
    flar2#3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
    flar2#4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
    flar2#5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    flar2#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    flar2#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    flar2#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@kimocoder
serial: 8250_omap: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context …
56bd8a7 
…during probe

[ Upstream commit 4ce35a3617c0ac758c61122b2218b6c8c9ac9398 ]

When booting j721e the following bug is printed:

[    1.154821] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99
[    1.154827] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1
[    1.154832] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
[    1.154836]  #0: ffff000840030728 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154852]  flar2#1: ffff80001214fdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154860]  flar2#2: ffff00084060b170 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x138
[    1.154872] irq event stamp: 63096
[    1.154881] hardirqs last  enabled at (63095): [<ffff800010b74318>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0x78
[    1.154887] hardirqs last disabled at (63096): [<ffff800010b740d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x28/0x80
[    1.154893] softirqs last  enabled at (62254): [<ffff800010080c88>] _stext+0x488/0x564
[    1.154899] softirqs last disabled at (62247): [<ffff8000100fdb3c>] irq_exit+0x114/0x140
[    1.154906] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6-next-20200318-00094-g45e4089b0bd3 #221
[    1.154911] Hardware name: Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC (DT)
[    1.154917] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[    1.154923] Call trace:
[    1.154928]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[    1.154933]  show_stack+0x14/0x20
[    1.154940]  dump_stack+0xe0/0x148
[    1.154946]  ___might_sleep+0x150/0x1f0
[    1.154952]  __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80
[    1.154957]  wait_for_completion_timeout+0x40/0x140
[    1.154964]  ti_sci_set_device_state+0xa0/0x158
[    1.154969]  ti_sci_cmd_get_device_exclusive+0x14/0x20
[    1.154977]  ti_sci_dev_start+0x34/0x50
[    1.154984]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x78/0x1f8
[    1.154991]  __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x140
[    1.154996]  rpm_callback+0x20/0x80
[    1.155001]  rpm_resume+0x568/0x758
[    1.155007]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x44/0xb0
[    1.155013]  omap8250_probe+0x2b4/0x508
[    1.155019]  platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
[    1.155023]  really_probe+0xd4/0x318
[    1.155028]  driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8
[    1.155033]  __device_attach_driver+0x80/0xb8
[    1.155039]  bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xc0
[    1.155044]  __device_attach+0xdc/0x138
[    1.155049]  device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
[    1.155053]  bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0
[    1.155058]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0
[    1.155063]  process_one_work+0x280/0x6e8
[    1.155068]  worker_thread+0x48/0x430
[    1.155073]  kthread+0x108/0x138
[    1.155079]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

To fix the bug we need to first call pm_runtime_enable() prior to any
pm_runtime calls.

Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320125200.6772-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@sm00th @kimocoder
pty: do tty_flip_buffer_push without port->lock in pty_write
78fb034 
[ Upstream commit 71a174b39f10b4b93223d374722aa894b5d8a82e ]

b6da31b2c07c "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag"
puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following
possible circular locking dependency:

[30129.876566] ======================================================
[30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ flar2#3 Tainted: G S      W
[30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------
[30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock:
[30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90

[30129.876572] but task is already holding lock:
[30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca

[30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[30129.876578] -> flar2#3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876581]        _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[30129.876581]        __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0
[30129.876582]        queue_work_on+0x78/0x80
[30129.876582]        pty_write+0x165/0x1e0
[30129.876583]        n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00
[30129.876583]        tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0
[30129.876584]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876588] -> flar2#2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876590]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876591]        tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0
[30129.876592]        tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30
[30129.876592]        serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970
[30129.876593]        serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380
[30129.876593]        serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0
[30129.876594]        serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0
[30129.876595]        __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850

[30129.876602] -> flar2#1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876605]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876605]        serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900
[30129.876606]        console_unlock+0x679/0xa90
[30129.876606]        register_console+0x371/0x6e0
[30129.876607]        univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27
[30129.876607]        console_init+0x2f9/0x45e

[30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}:
[30129.876611]        __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876612]        lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876612]        console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876613]        vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876613]        printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876614]        show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876615]        show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876615]        __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876616]        write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876616]        proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876617]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this:

[30129.876620] Chain exists of:
[30129.876621]   console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1

[30129.876625]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[30129.876626]        CPU0                    CPU1
[30129.876626]        ----                    ----
[30129.876627]   lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876628]                                lock(&port->lock#2);
[30129.876630]                                lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876631]   lock(console_owner);

[30129.876633]  *** DEADLOCK ***

[30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222:
[30129.876634]  #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650
[30129.876637]  flar2#1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460
[30129.876640]  flar2#2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0
[30129.876642]  flar2#3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca
[30129.876645]  flar2#4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420

[30129.876648] stack backtrace:
[30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S      W         5.9.0-rc2+ flar2#3
[30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012
[30129.876650] Call Trace:
[30129.876650]  dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0
[30129.876651]  check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410
[30129.876653]  __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876656]  lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876658]  console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876660]  vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876660]  printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876661]  show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876662]  show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876664]  __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876665]  write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876665]  proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876666]  vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and
there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock.

Fixes: b6da31b2c07c ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@kimocoder
dmaengine: pl330: _prep_dma_memcpy: Fix wrong burst size
a143ee8 
[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ]

Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'.
we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size.

dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126
@ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA:

dmatest:

/# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel
/# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size
/# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom
/# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose
/# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run

dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000
dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result flar2#8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000

Before:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0)

After this patch:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0)

After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz:

  dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0)

Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@josefbacik @kimocoder
btrfs: sysfs: init devices outside of the chunk_mutex
123ae4d 
commit ca10845a56856fff4de3804c85e6424d0f6d0cde upstream

While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the
following lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc3+ flar2#4 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> flar2#3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
	 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
	 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270
	 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0
	 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0
	 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
	 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240
	 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x434/0xc00
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> flar2#2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
	 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0
	 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
	 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130
	 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> flar2#1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
	 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0
	 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140
	 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020
	 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90
	 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b
	 btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800
	 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0
	 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0
	 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
	 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
	 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
	 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
	 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
	 kthread+0x138/0x160
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(kernfs_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
   #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   flar2#1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
   flar2#2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ flar2#4
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8
   check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
   __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
   lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
   evict+0xcf/0x1f0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
   do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
   shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
   shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
   balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
   kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
   ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
   ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
   kthread+0x138/0x160
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of
adding in a new device.  However we only need to hold the
device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices
devices.  Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get
rid of this lockdep splat.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@nathanlynch @kimocoder
powerpc/pseries/hibernation: drop pseries_suspend_begin() from suspen…
89e499b 
…d ops

[ Upstream commit 52719fce3f4c7a8ac9eaa191e8d75a697f9fbcbc ]

There are three ways pseries_suspend_begin() can be reached:

1. When "mem" is written to /sys/power/state:

kobj_attr_store()
-> state_store()
  -> pm_suspend()
    -> suspend_devices_and_enter()
      -> pseries_suspend_begin()

This never works because there is no way to supply a valid stream id
using this interface, and H_VASI_STATE is called with a stream id of
zero. So this call path is useless at best.

2. When a stream id is written to /sys/devices/system/power/hibernate.
pseries_suspend_begin() is polled directly from store_hibernate()
until the stream is in the "Suspending" state (i.e. the platform is
ready for the OS to suspend execution):

dev_attr_store()
-> store_hibernate()
  -> pseries_suspend_begin()

3. When a stream id is written to /sys/devices/system/power/hibernate
(continued). After flar2#2, pseries_suspend_begin() is called once again
from the pm core:

dev_attr_store()
-> store_hibernate()
  -> pm_suspend()
    -> suspend_devices_and_enter()
      -> pseries_suspend_begin()

This is redundant because the VASI suspend state is already known to
be Suspending.

The begin() callback of platform_suspend_ops is optional, so we can
simply remove that assignment with no loss of function.

Fixes: 32d8ad4 ("powerpc/pseries: Partition hibernation support")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201207215200.1785968-18-nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kimocoder pushed a commit to kimocoder/OnePlus6 that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@chenglin130 @kimocoder
nfs_common: need lock during iterate through the list
08ceae3 
[ Upstream commit 4a9d81caf841cd2c0ae36abec9c2963bf21d0284 ]

If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration
process will fall into an endless loop.

kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137]

PID: 17137  TASK: ffff8818d93c0000  CPU: 4   COMMAND: "nfsd"
    [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76]
    RIP: ffffffffc00e817c  RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98  RFLAGS: 00000246
    RAX: ffff881dc0c38298  RBX: ffffffff81b03580  RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50
    RDX: ffff881e3fce8500  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: ffffffff81b03580
    RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0   R8: 0000000000000020   R9: ffff8818d3aefd40
    R10: ffff88017fc03800  R11: ffff8818e83933c0  R12: ffff8818d3aefd40
    R13: 0000000000000000  R14: ffff8818e8391068  R15: ffff8818fa6e4000
    CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace]
 flar2#1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd]
 flar2#2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd]
 flar2#3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd]
 flar2#4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd]
 flar2#5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc]
 flar2#6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc]
 flar2#7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd]
 flar2#8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1
 #9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607

The troublemake elem:
crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298
struct lock_manager {
  list = {
    next = 0xffff881dc0c38298,
    prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298
  },
  block_opens = false
}

Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens")
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@theoneandonly-vector