Verifying the package as an official one

[zefr0x]

Since this flatpak package is mentioned in darktable's official website, in https://www.darktable.org/install/. It would be a great thing if it is verified in flathub.

Read more: https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification/

[paperdigits]

Probably not going to happen, the official stance of the project, especially for *nix, is that they distribute source code only. I see that I obliterated the "3rd party" header in one of my website refactors, I should probably add it back.

…

On November 11, 2023 12:31:22 PM PST, zefr0x ***@***.***> wrote: Since this flatpak package is mentioned in darktable's official website, in https://www.darktable.org/install/. It would be a great thing if it is verified in flathub. Read more: https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/verification/ -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #115 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zefr0x]

I understand this, but flatpak is a universal package that represents the project in Linux, so they might reconsider this idea and make an exception.

[paperdigits]

The problem is that if you endorse one, you have to endorse them all, since snap and appimage and statically compiled binaries are also universal package formats on Linux. We have been over this several times before, and the answer has always been the same.

…

On November 11, 2023 12:52:21 PM PST, zefr0x ***@***.***> wrote: I understand this, but flatpak is a universal package that represents the project in Linux, so they might reconsider this idea and make an exception. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #115 (comment) You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: ***@***.***>