Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advanced Features/Feedback Loops #17

Closed
alfa256 opened this issue Aug 10, 2014 · 10 comments
Closed

Advanced Features/Feedback Loops #17

alfa256 opened this issue Aug 10, 2014 · 10 comments

Comments

@alfa256
Copy link

alfa256 commented Aug 10, 2014

Explanation required.

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 12, 2014

There is no heading for this - should it be under Flow Features? By the way, are you asking about loop topologies in networks? If so, I can give it a try.

@alfa256
Copy link
Author

alfa256 commented Aug 12, 2014

It's in https://github.com/flowbased/flowbased.org/wiki/Concepts too, so it's up to you., I didn't add that item to the file but @trustmaster .

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 12, 2014

Hi Vladimir,

What did you have in mind?

Cheers,

Paul
On 2014-08-12 1:46 PM, "alfa256" notifications@github.com wrote:

It's in https://github.com/flowbased/flowbased.org/wiki/Concepts too, so
it's up to you., I didn't add that item to the file but @trustmaster
https://github.com/trustmaster .


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)
.

@trustmaster
Copy link
Member

Right, I meant "Loop type networks" in terms of the book and components with outputs looped back to inputs. I thought this is important since most dataflow systems don't allow it, while FBP uses them to implement interesting stuff like iterative algos, recursive algos and responsive UIs.

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 12, 2014

OK, got it! I'll try to come up with something over the next few days. Not
sure about recursive though - I raised that as an issue already!

Regards,

Paul
On 2014-08-12 2:58 PM, "Vladimir Sibirov" notifications@github.com wrote:

Right, I meant "Loop type networks" in terms of the book and components
with outputs looped back to inputs. I thought this is important since most
dataflow systems don't allow it, while FBP uses them to implement
interesting stuff like iterative algos, recursive algos and responsive UIs.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)
.

@bergie
Copy link
Member

bergie commented Aug 14, 2014

Loop-type networks are quite common when building interactive applications (see the Flux pattern from Facebook) as well as with when reading a hierarchical file system.

Here is one example:

screenshot 2014-08-14 at 13 13 10

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 14, 2014

Hi Henri,

You're right - I was quoting someone else. I'll change or drop that
statement!

Thanks,

Paul

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Henri Bergius notifications@github.com
wrote:

Loop-type networks are quite common when building interactive applications
(see the Flux pattern from Facebook
http://facebook.github.io/react/docs/flux-overview.html as well as with
when reading a hierarchical file system.

Here http://app.flowhub.io/#example/1d42f66f5cc4614df935 is one example:

[image: screenshot 2014-08-14 at 13 13 10]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3346/3919165/05d9e0ba-23a4-11e4-8737-c65f4c65f529.png


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)
.

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 22, 2014

I think we can close this one as nobody seems to have changed the section on Feedback loops recently...?

@trustmaster
Copy link
Member

@jpaulm just being lazy or busy. Feel free to update the section and close this issue then.

@jpaulm
Copy link
Contributor

jpaulm commented Aug 22, 2014

Looks like the section on Feedback loops is fairly stable... (?)

@jpaulm jpaulm closed this as completed Aug 22, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants