-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 319
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
flutter doctor should test for IntelliJ not Atom #229
flutter doctor should test for IntelliJ not Atom #229
Comments
cc @danrubel |
@danrubel thinking more about this, I actually think we should do the new IntelliJ checks for fishfood so that we catch config issues for new users there. Looks like pq already tagged it. Does that sound reasonable? |
@danrubel should we consolidate those two bugs? |
@danrubel : is this reasonably on track for this week or should we push it to the next milestone? |
Detecting IntelliJ on Linux has landed. Working on detecting it on Mac today. |
🎉 |
@danrubel : I think this was close for the Mac right? Still only seeing Atom... |
It's close. Got distracted on other things. Need to address review comments for flutter/flutter#6262, land it, then we'll have support for Mac. |
Cool! Question. After a sync, I'm not seeing anything. Does this mean it cannot find my IntelliJ installation(s)?
|
Where do you have it installed? |
|
The standard (when you run the IntelliJ |
Makes sense!
I don't think it's unreasonable. At least one level deep. It's pretty common for folks to do a little management of their Apps directory. |
Landed. 🎉 |
Current output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: