Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flutter doctor should test for IntelliJ not Atom #229

Closed
mit-mit opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 15 comments · Fixed by flutter/flutter#6262 or flutter/flutter#6419
Closed

flutter doctor should test for IntelliJ not Atom #229

mit-mit opened this issue Oct 4, 2016 · 15 comments · Fixed by flutter/flutter#6262 or flutter/flutter#6419
Assignees

Comments

@mit-mit
Copy link
Member

mit-mit commented Oct 4, 2016

Current output:

$ flutter doctor
...
[✓] Atom - a lightweight development environment for Flutter
    • flutter plugin version 0.2.4
    • dartlang plugin version 0.6.38
@mit-mit mit-mit added the task label Oct 4, 2016
@mit-mit mit-mit added this to the atom-parity milestone Oct 4, 2016
@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 4, 2016

cc @danrubel

@pq pq modified the milestones: fishfood, atom-parity Oct 4, 2016
@mit-mit
Copy link
Member Author

mit-mit commented Oct 4, 2016

@danrubel thinking more about this, I actually think we should do the new IntelliJ checks for fishfood so that we catch config issues for new users there. Looks like pq already tagged it. Does that sound reasonable?

@danrubel
Copy link

danrubel commented Oct 4, 2016

flutter/flutter#5875

@mit-mit
Copy link
Member Author

mit-mit commented Oct 5, 2016

@danrubel should we consolidate those two bugs?

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 10, 2016

@danrubel : is this reasonably on track for this week or should we push it to the next milestone?

@danrubel
Copy link

Detecting IntelliJ on Linux has landed. Working on detecting it on Mac today.

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 10, 2016

🎉

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 13, 2016

@danrubel : I think this was close for the Mac right?

screen shot 2016-10-13 at 6 19 15 am

Still only seeing Atom...

@danrubel
Copy link

It's close. Got distracted on other things. Need to address review comments for flutter/flutter#6262, land it, then we'll have support for Mac.

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 13, 2016

Cool!

Question. After a sync, I'm not seeing anything. Does this mean it cannot find my IntelliJ installation(s)?

[~/src/git/clones/flutter] (master) $ flutter doctor
[✓] Flutter (on Mac OS, channel master)
    • Flutter at /Users/pquitslund/src/git/clones/flutter
    • Framework revision e20ee045ba (44 minutes ago), 2016-10-13 10:44:20
    • Engine revision cf774d580c
    • Tools Dart version 1.20.0-dev.10.2

[x] Android toolchain - develop for Android devices
    x Android Studio / Android SDK not found. Download from https://developer.android.com/sdk/
      (or visit https://flutter.io/setup/#android-setup for detailed instructions).

[-] iOS toolchain - develop for iOS devices (Xcode 7.3.1)
    • XCode at /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
    • Xcode 7.3.1, Build version 7D1014
    x ideviceinstaller not available; this is used to discover connected iOS devices.
      Install via 'brew install ideviceinstaller'.
    x ios-deploy not available; this is used to deploy to connected iOS devices.
      Install via 'brew install ios-deploy'.

[✓] Atom - a lightweight development environment for Flutter
    • flutter plugin version 0.2.4
    • dartlang plugin version 0.6.37

[✓] Connected devices
    • iPhone 6s Plus • 0D7C1CC6-767A-469B-B98E-6D2A295E8CDD • ios (simulator)

@pq pq reopened this Oct 13, 2016
@danrubel
Copy link

Where do you have it installed?
If you email me the exact path, I can check that I'm searching the right directories.

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 13, 2016

/Application/Tools is where I have all my IDEs but I'm guessing that's not standard. Of course, what is standard?

@danrubel
Copy link

The standard (when you run the IntelliJ *.dmg) is for it to be installed in /Applications and that's where the code checks. Should it scan /Application subfolders as well?

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 13, 2016

Makes sense!

Should it scan /Application subfolders as well?

I don't think it's unreasonable. At least one level deep. It's pretty common for folks to do a little management of their Apps directory.

@pq
Copy link
Contributor

pq commented Oct 17, 2016

Landed. 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants