-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Macrocycles don't close if CG/G distance beyond cutoff (issue in Vina) #67
Comments
We set the cutoff to 20 Angstrom for the interactions involving the pseudo-atoms that restore the bond. Could you confirm that the very long bond is longer than 20 Angstrom? |
Non-polar hydrogens are expected because The potential to restore the bond increases linearly with distance, but after the cutoff (20 Angstroms) it is zero. The easiest short term solution is to recompile Vina and set the cutoff to a larger value. A better long term solution would be to use that term directly without precalculating it, so no cutoff is used, but I don't think we will implement that anytime soon. That cutoff is set here on line 52, and also You'd change the code and re-compile locally: https://autodock-vina.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html#building-from-source |
Yes, thank you very much |
Dear diogomart,
I'm currently docking several macrocycles.
Some of small rings-macrocycles is good after cross-docking but macrocycles with large rings does not have appropriate pose and scoree after docking. Here's the cross-docking results with 3 macrocycles
I've read about flexible macrocycles docking but the result was really bad.
Here I attached the image of docking pose, chemical structure and code for docking.
docking_code.txt
Can you look at it and provide me some solutions.
Thanks in advanced.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: