fix: Skip onboarding for invite

[Dhruwang]

What does this PR do?

Fixes 2008

How should this be tested?

Test onboarding for

1. Team invite
2. ONBOARDING_DISABLED=0
3. ONBOARDING_DISABLED=1

Checklist

Required

• Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
• Read How we Code at Formbricks
• Self-reviewed my own code
• Commented on my code in hard-to-understand bits
• Ran pnpm build
• Checked for warnings, there are none
• Removed all console.logs
• Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
• My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

• If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
• Updated the Formbricks Docs if changes were necessary

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
formbricks-cloud	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Mar 15, 2024 9:50am
formbricks-com	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Mar 15, 2024 9:50am

[github-actions]

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

[review-agent-prime]

apps/web/app/(auth)/invite/page.tsx

It's a good practice to use destructuring to make the code more readable and clean. This will also help in avoiding repetition of code.
Create Issue
See the diff
Checkout the fix

    const { name, email } = invite.creator;
    sendInviteAcceptedEmail(name ?? "", session.user?.name ?? "", email);

git fetch origin && git checkout -b ReviewBot/Impro-3h0byz3 origin/ReviewBot/Impro-3h0byz3

[review-agent-prime]

Using destructuring to make the code more readable and clean. This will also help in avoiding repetition of code.

Suggested change

	sendInviteAcceptedEmail(invite.creator.name ?? "", session.user?.name ?? "", invite.creator.email);
	const { name, email } = invite.creator;
	sendInviteAcceptedEmail(name ?? "", session.user?.name ?? "", email);

[mattinannt]

@Dhruwang thanks for the fix :-) looks good, only one thing that needs a change:

[mattinannt]

@Dhruwang thanks for making the changes; looks good :-)