-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verify license of selfoss contributions #1218
Comments
👍 version 3 and newer are perfect! |
Also note that this only concerns the license of the source code of selfoss itself. The license of the resulting application bundle will depend on the licenses of our dependencies and we will need to do a audit to figure it out 🙀 And just to be clear and explicit: I agree with licensing my contributions to selfoss under GNU GPL 3 or any later version. |
At least the Weblate translations are marked GPL3+ so that reduces the fraction of contributors we need to ask. |
GPL3+ is good for me. |
Hi, I made some commits back in the day ( #632 , #605 ) but my emails written in a different format, and until just not not associated with my github account - that is why I didn't show up here. Anyway, for the actual change, I'm +1 for GPL3+. |
@dubbl Right, I noticed that too, and started to compile a list of e-mails but cannot really post it here and have it on the other computer. Anyway, I made few GraphQL requests using the following query on https://developer.github.com/v4/explorer/ and got seven JSON documents. {
repository(owner: "fossar", name: "selfoss") {
pullRequests(first: 100, after: "…",) {
nodes {
author {
login
}
url
id
}
pageInfo {
endCursor
startCursor
hasNextPage
}
}
}
} Then I slurped them using Hopefully, no one contributed using different method than pull requests or Weblate, I have no idea how to cross-reference it easily. |
Hi, I am fine with GPL3+, is this the right place to confirm? |
@ochristi Yes, here is fine. Thank you. |
I agree with licensing my contributions to selfoss under GNU GPL 3 or any later version. |
You can count me in, I agree with GPL3+ |
I agree with GPL v3 or later |
The README and other documents state:
But it is not clear if this was meant to be only version 3 of the license, or also allow later versions of GPL, as strongly recommended by GNU foundation – people often use this phrasing, considering the upgradability obvious.
See also https://gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html
In order to clear up this uncertainty, we will need the past contributors to confirm if they are fine with licensing their contribution under GPL 3 or later, or remove their contributions.
cc @SSilence @niol
» Checklist of selfoss contributors who agreed with licensing their contributions under GPL 3+ «
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: