Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Logo Suggestions #7

Open
indieNik opened this issue Mar 11, 2015 · 19 comments
Open

Logo Suggestions #7

indieNik opened this issue Mar 11, 2015 · 19 comments

Comments

@indieNik
Copy link

Please vote for your choice (in the comments, if possible?)

  1. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-27-05-315
  2. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-28-14-368
  3. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-29-55-411
  4. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-30-02-390
  5. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-30-09-813
  6. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-30-21-742
  7. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-32-09-633
  8. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-32-28-060
  9. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-32-39-331
  10. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-32-48-672
  11. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-03-194
  12. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-12-089
    13.bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-22-764
  13. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-32-629
  14. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-41-636
  15. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-33-50-129
  16. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-34-51-550
  17. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-34-59-063
  18. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-35-15-451
  19. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-35-40-752
  20. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-35-48-123
  21. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-36-00-613
  22. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-36-49-796
  23. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-37-06-765
  24. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-37-23-563
  25. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-37-31-201
  26. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-37-39-404
  27. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-37-52-979
  28. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-38-16-139
  29. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-38-23-375
  30. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-39-24-475
  31. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-39-33-993
  32. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-40-17-750
  33. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-40-30-682
  34. bandicam 2015-03-11 18-40-38-001
@digen digen mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2015
@digen
Copy link
Member

digen commented Mar 12, 2015

logo-by-hrj

@gsama
Copy link

gsama commented Mar 13, 2015

I'll vote for 9 - Speech bubbles with hands.
It goes well with foss as it highlights volunteerism and having a voice - making a statement.

Two concern though -

  1. We should use fonts which are free and open source.
    https://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/
    http://openfontlibrary.org/
    http://www.google.com/fonts/
  2. Do we need image in the logo or just text?

@gsama
Copy link

gsama commented Mar 13, 2015

I did a reverse image search

screenshot 2015-03-13 08 21 39

Does not go well with foss unless the image is Creative Commons.

@indieNik
Copy link
Author

Disclaimer: These logos are not my original creation! Posted them here, so we can have our views on the "Theme and Goal of the Organization" and then build something similar or improve on it!

Source of the images: Designmantic

@hiteshd
Copy link
Contributor

hiteshd commented Mar 14, 2015

My vote for #9. The logo with the hands and Speech Bubbles.

@SwAtm
Copy link
Member

SwAtm commented Mar 14, 2015

#18, or #22

@yrm4foss
Copy link
Member

My vote for #20. It shows three hands raised up in air under the stars. That could signify collective effort by multiple people to reach the stars/ excellence. Also, since they are not in a loop it signifies openness and inclusion; in line with our group values.

@526prasad
Copy link

My vote for #5 and #9

@digen
Copy link
Member

digen commented Mar 18, 2015

My vote for 9 or 21.

@digen
Copy link
Member

digen commented Mar 24, 2015

Got these designed.

  1. logo 36
  2. logo 37
  3. logo 38
    1. logo 39
    2. logo 40
    3. logo 41

@digen
Copy link
Member

digen commented Mar 31, 2015

@gsama @indieNik @hiteshd @SwAtm @yrm4foss Based on vote count shall we freeze on 9 ? If yes, then do we need check for plagiarism ?

@SwAtm
Copy link
Member

SwAtm commented Apr 1, 2015

We can freeze on #9.
If we can get someone to make slight changes, may be just swap between left and right, we can avoid copyright issues if any. So far as plagiarism is concerned, I have no idea about it.
Regards,
Swami Atmapranananda


On Tue, 31/3/15, Swapneel Patnekar notifications@github.com wrote:

Subject: Re: [website] Logo Suggestions (#7)
To: "fosstr/website" website@noreply.github.com
Cc: "SwAtm" swamiatmapranananda@yahoo.co.in
Date: Tuesday, 31 March, 2015, 12:14 PM

@gsama @indieNik @hiteshd @SwAtm @yrm4foss Based on
vote count shall we freeze on 9 ? If yes, then do we need
check for plagiarism ?


Reply to this email directly or view
it on GitHub.

@gsama
Copy link

gsama commented Apr 1, 2015

Yes, If anybody can take that as a base and work on it, it'll be great.
I don't know whether it will be still considered as plagiarism or whether
it will avoid copyright issues.
Gautam

On 1 April 2015 at 13:06, SwAtm notifications@github.com wrote:

We can freeze on #9.
If we can get someone to make slight changes, may be just swap between
left and right, we can avoid copyright issues if any. So far as plagiarism
is concerned, I have no idea about it.
Regards,
Swami Atmapranananda


On Tue, 31/3/15, Swapneel Patnekar notifications@github.com wrote:

Subject: Re: [website] Logo Suggestions (#7)
To: "fosstr/website" website@noreply.github.com
Cc: "SwAtm" swamiatmapranananda@yahoo.co.in
Date: Tuesday, 31 March, 2015, 12:14 PM

@gsama @indieNik @hiteshd @SwAtm @yrm4foss Based on
vote count shall we freeze on 9 ? If yes, then do we need
check for plagiarism ?


Reply to this email directly or view
it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7 (comment).

@gsama
Copy link

gsama commented Apr 4, 2015

Yesterday, I put together a simple type style for the handout. Since most members present liked it, I propose it as logo. I have modified and changed it a little to make it better (hopefully).

screenshot 2015-04-04 10 38 10

screenshot 2015-04-04 10 38 28

"fosstr" uses Roboto font by Christian Robertson and is part of Google Open Source fonts - Apache License, version 2.0
Typeface: Bold
Spacing: Condensed by 1.0 pt

".org" uses Liberation Sans by RedHat which is GNU General public License
Typeface: Regular
Spacing Condensed by 5.0 pts

Logic of the Logo
The Logo is easily replicable in a LibreOffice Document without even having a jpeg. (By installing fonts and adjusting typeface and spacing.)
No copyright / plagiarism issues.
All lowercase font signifies technology - coding
I prefer the ".org" as it indicates that it is a community project and gives it more human feel. It also makes one feel the community is much larger than it is. (marketing) :)

@hiteshd
Copy link
Contributor

hiteshd commented Apr 4, 2015

I like the idea of a text based logo rather than a graphic logo since it avoids a lot of copyright issues. And that it is simple and to the point.

+1 from me for the idea

@SwAtm
Copy link
Member

SwAtm commented Apr 4, 2015

+1 for fosstr (sans .org)
Regards,
Swami Atmapranananda


On Sat, 4/4/15, gsama notifications@github.com wrote:

Subject: Re: [website] Logo Suggestions (#7)
To: "fosstr/website" website@noreply.github.com
Cc: "SwAtm" swamiatmapranananda@yahoo.co.in
Date: Saturday, 4 April, 2015, 11:08 AM

Yesterday, I put together a
simple type style for the handout. Since most members
present liked it I propose it as logo. I have modified and
changed it a little to make it better (hopefully).

"fosstr" uses Roboto font by Christian
Robertson and is part of Google Open Source fonts - Apache
License, version 2.0

Typeface: Bold

Spacing: Condensed by 1.0 pt

".org" uses Liberation Sans by RedHat which is
GNU General public License

Typeface: Regular

Spacing Condensed by 5.0 pts

Logic of the Logo

The Logo is easily replicable in a LibreOffice Document
without even having a jpeg. (By installing fonts and
adjusting typeface and spacing.)

No copyright / plagiarism issues.

All lowercase font signifies technology - coding

I prefer the ".org" as it indicates that it is a
community project and gives it more human feel. It also
makes one the community is much larger than it is.
(marketing) :)


Reply to this email directly or view
it on GitHub.

@indieNik
Copy link
Author

indieNik commented Apr 4, 2015

Yes. This looks lot more simpler and is out of copyright issues!

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:18 PM, SwAtm notifications@github.com wrote:

+1 for fosstr (sans .org)
Regards,
Swami Atmapranananda


On Sat, 4/4/15, gsama notifications@github.com wrote:

Subject: Re: [website] Logo Suggestions (#7)
To: "fosstr/website" website@noreply.github.com
Cc: "SwAtm" swamiatmapranananda@yahoo.co.in
Date: Saturday, 4 April, 2015, 11:08 AM

Yesterday, I put together a
simple type style for the handout. Since most members
present liked it I propose it as logo. I have modified and
changed it a little to make it better (hopefully).

"fosstr" uses Roboto font by Christian
Robertson and is part of Google Open Source fonts - Apache
License, version 2.0

Typeface: Bold

Spacing: Condensed by 1.0 pt

".org" uses Liberation Sans by RedHat which is
GNU General public License

Typeface: Regular

Spacing Condensed by 5.0 pts

Logic of the Logo

The Logo is easily replicable in a LibreOffice Document
without even having a jpeg. (By installing fonts and
adjusting typeface and spacing.)

No copyright / plagiarism issues.

All lowercase font signifies technology - coding

I prefer the ".org" as it indicates that it is a
community project and gives it more human feel. It also
makes one the community is much larger than it is.
(marketing) :)


Reply to this email directly or view
it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7 (comment).

@digen
Copy link
Member

digen commented Apr 8, 2015

+1

Logo has been added to the website. Kindly review and suggest any design modifications.

@526prasad
Copy link

+1 form me also for text based logo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants