feat(invariant): add statefulFuzz as an alias to invariant
#4922
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Evalir
changed the title
statefulFuzz as an alias to invariantstatefulFuzz as an alias to invariant
mattsse
approved these changes
May 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Closes #4650
There's been repeated discussion about how to call fuzz/invariant tests. One of the things proposed for invariants is to add some alias that could be used instead of invariant to more properly narrow down its meaning, without necessarily removing the usage of
invariantyet.Solution
Adds
statefulFuzzas an alias toinvariant, as suggested in the linked issue.I personally do not have strong opinions on what alias we should use, and
statefulFuzzfeels a tad long—feel free to nitpick!Proposed plan is:
invariantmight not be supported in a future 2.0 release.invariantkeyword.