Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(0.3.4): readability improvements #180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2022

Conversation

ryanrussell
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Ryan Russell git@ryanrussell.org

Signed-off-by: Ryan Russell <git@ryanrussell.org>
Copy link
Member

@arctic-hen7 arctic-hen7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work, thank you very much!

@ryanrussell
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see a few other little things in other docs versions... Couple questions

  1. Should changes be made in docs/0.4.0 or docs/next or both? Is next just a symlink?

  2. Do you want me to do the same for the older doc versions or just let them rip? Two minutes to fix, but doubt many people are going back in time :)

-r

@arctic-hen7
Copy link
Member

The next and 0.4.0 docs are distinct (though they're unified before a release), so changes would need to be made to both. Right now, I think it should be fine to make them to next and then just copy that all to 0.4.0.

As for the older docs, that's up to you! I don't really mind either way.

@arctic-hen7
Copy link
Member

@ryanrussell do you want to make those changes in this PR, or shall I merge this and you can make them in another PR?

@ryanrussell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just merge this one. I'm abroad with limited connectivity... Will send the rest when I can.

@arctic-hen7 arctic-hen7 merged commit 1def873 into framesurge:main Aug 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants