sprout from current branch if only 1 argument is provided

[franciscolourenco]

I tried to "git sprout test" and expected a test branch to be created from the current branch, but instead it complained there was no branch called test.

when providing only one argument, sprout should branch from the current branch into a new branch with the name passed in the argument

[kennethreitz]

Absolutely, thanks!

[cayblood]

What is the use case for a multi-arg version of sprout? The one in the docs is single arg.

[franciscolourenco]

it seems some of docs are not consistently up to date since they are spread over at least 3 locations

On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 11:57 , Carl Youngblood wrote:

What is the use case for a multi-arg version of sprout? The one in the docs is single arg.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#37 (comment)

[kennethreitz]

Readme is more specific than the website because I'd like the website to be as concise as possible.

Inconsistencies == bugs in the code.

[franciscolourenco]

I understand.
I was referring to this particular page ( http://www.git-legit.org/ ) where many commands feature only 1 argument, but in reality they need two.

In the other 2 references I found ( http://kennethreitz.com/legit-the-sexy-git-cli.html , https://github.com/kennethreitz/legit ) the commands seem to better represent the current state.

It was in this sense that I meant there is an inconsistency between the first page and the 2 others as well with the current version. I thought this page was the main (It looks pretty good btw), and therefore don't understand why is out of date, or is it predicting future changes?

cheers :)

On Saturday, March 31, 2012 at 06:20 , Kenneth Reitz wrote:

Readme is more specific than the website because I'd like the website to be as concise as possible.

Inconsistencies == bugs in the code.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#37 (comment)

[kennethreitz]

@aristidesfl they should all require only one. the second parameter is supplementary.

If some of them don't work with one currently, that's a bug.

[franciscolourenco]

that's great :)

On Saturday, March 31, 2012 at 17:07 , Kenneth Reitz wrote:

@aristidesfl they should all require only one. the second parameter is supplementary.

If some of them don't work with one currently, that's a bug.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#37 (comment)

[miguelbaldi]

Seems to be working now, on 'develop' branch.

[franciscolourenco]

There is currently no quick way to merge the current branch into another branch, neither with git nor with legit.

Shouldn't harvest take care of this when used with only one parameter?
Otherwise it is similar to git merge (when used only with one parameter)

[patcon]

^^ @aristidesfl got me thinking :)

[borisrorsvort]

+1

[weakish]

Close this since the sprout command has been removed.