You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that Fyne's theme/fonts folder contains Google's Noto Mono and Noto Sans fonts, which are covered by the SIL Open Font License 1.1. The problem is, that license is not in the folder (or anywhere else I saw), and instead the folder contains an Apache license in LICENSE.txt, for some reason.
(The folder also contains DejaVuSansMono-Powerline.ttf, but the Apache license can't be for that, because that's covered by its own license which is already in LICENSE_DejaVu-Powerline.txt)
So I'm guessing the apache license is there instead of the SIL OFL by mistake?
I noticed that Fyne's theme/fonts folder contains Google's Noto Mono and Noto Sans fonts, which are covered by the SIL Open Font License 1.1. The problem is, that license is not in the folder (or anywhere else I saw), and instead the folder contains an Apache license in LICENSE.txt, for some reason.
(The folder also contains DejaVuSansMono-Powerline.ttf, but the Apache license can't be for that, because that's covered by its own license which is already in LICENSE_DejaVu-Powerline.txt)
So I'm guessing the apache license is there instead of the SIL OFL by mistake?
Here's a website that says what the license is for noto sans and noto mono:
https://www.fontsquirrel.com/license/noto-mono
https://www.fontsquirrel.com/license/noto-sans
It's also stated to be the SIL OFL by adobe's website: https://fonts.adobe.com/variations/40409/eula
And probably on lots of other sites too.
P.S. go-licenses does not seem to notice the licenses in the theme/fonts folder, but I figure that's more their problem than yours.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: