Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a better way to implement filters #64

Closed
stoewer opened this issue Feb 10, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Find a better way to implement filters #64

stoewer opened this issue Feb 10, 2014 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@stoewer
Copy link
Collaborator

stoewer commented Feb 10, 2014

Currently there is no type of class defined for filter methods which makes method signatures very verbose:

findSections(std::function<bool(const Section&)> filter = util::acceptAllFilter<Section>, ...);
@stoewer stoewer added this to the First Alpha milestone Feb 10, 2014
@stoewer stoewer self-assigned this Feb 10, 2014
@gicmo gicmo closed this as completed in 31dc97e Feb 10, 2014
gicmo added a commit to gicmo/nix that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2015
A superclass for filters (closes G-Node#64)

LGTO. Test also locally.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant