Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaffolding without Illumina reads #49

Closed
ATVincent opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Scaffolding without Illumina reads #49

ATVincent opened this issue May 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@ATVincent
Copy link

Hello,

First, I want to thank you for this remarkable tool.

I used Redundans with only PacBio reads since I do not have Illumina reads. Here is the command:

../redundans/redundans/redundans.py -v -t 6 --log LOG.redundans -l Reads_?.fastq -f contigs.fasta -o redundans_results

I was surprised to realize that Redundans can generate scaffolds without having pairing information provided by Illumina reads. Can I have some explications ? How it can determines the number of "N" ?

Thank you

@lpryszcz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for the nice words!
Redundans uses pyScaf for long-read & reference based scaffolding. Since you have only long reads, you can try DBG2OLC. It worked quite well for me on some data (better than pyScaf;) ).
Let me know how it worked!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants